Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
The History of the Illegitimate British Monarchy, Part 1 of Chptr 2, The Hallett Report
at 01:30 Posted by Vatic Master
Vatic Note: Well, they certainly did not want this blog to go up. They won't let me upload the embedded on the video of the interview, they won't let me upload the photos of Edward the 5th, etc.... Where you may see gaps is where they would not let me upload. After reading it, I can see why. This is truly a mind blowing revelation of the British monarchy.
I wonder how the British people will take to this news. This below just proves that there are no elite at the top of their human refuse pile, simply smellier and filthier rogues with way less integrity than a street full of homeless people. I promise that is the feeling you get when you read about all the filthy things these criminals have done over the years. Major felony crimes, indeed.
How dare they think they can enslave the rest of us who are way more moralistic than anyone of them. This proves there is more class in the pinky finger of a working man than in the entire body of a royal. I can see why we got rid of them when we did. I can also now see there is no conflict in the protocols when it says they should plan on getting rid of the royals so the goyim have no leadership. Well, the royals they want to get rid of are those with no khazar blood.
Read this below, along with my VN:'s and then go to the link in the title and you can see and check out the photos they would not let up here on this blog. Truth is our WMD, and given the shenanigans of the so called British Royals who were really khazars, who have no idea what truth is; it does not surprise me that this is all coming back to haunt them like a bad dream.
This below spends a good deal of print showing the khazar blood lines within the royal family of Britain that originated with Nathan Rothschild, who has no royal blood, but has contributed to the royal line when called upon to do so.
Timing of it all is perfect too. The khazars saw the British they control as the way in to their dream of running this entire planet. Its interesting that the only way they could do that was through deception, lies, cheating, lack of integrity, no moral code, no conscience, and massive deception, drug running, pedophilia etc.
No wonder the khazars control and run Great Britain. Everything is a scam including who the royals truly are. Most of those in recent history, say the last couple of hundred years, have no royal blood in them. And those that do are exiled in some other part of the commonwealth.
History is not what we have been told or what we thought it was. Its amazing what we do not know. I am surprised this guy is still alive.
THE HALLETT REPORT No. 3
The History of the Illegitimate British Monarchy
http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3.html#.Uu7fQKHfu5m
by Jorn, of the Hallet Report
Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett talks in an interview with Jörn about the British Monarchy and the History of the British Monarchy, which shows that the current monarchy has no right to be on the Throne . . .
Text from the movie above
Transcript from the Interview on the 5th of November 2011 Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett, Jörn
Jörn:
Hello, my name is Jörn, and this is the first part of Chapter 2 of our interview together with author, historian and active history maker Greg Hallett from New Zealand. And in this chapter we are going to talk about the British Monarchy and the History of the British Monarchy. Today’s date is the 1st of November 2011.
Lord Hallett, can you please tell us about the British Monarchy in general.
Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett:
Perhaps we should start with Queen Victoria being named ‘The Grandmother of Europe’ and her son King Edward VII being named ‘The Father of Europe’. (New research to come . . .) Queen Victoria needed to sire a child, get married and sire a child with a legitimate prince, which she did.
The legal age for marriage and conception in those days was 12, and she was 14 when she conceived, got married and gave birth. She never divorced, and in a later chapter we will talk about who that prince was. She never divorced, and when she married Prince Consort Albert, it was a bigamous marriage, and Prince Consort Albert was a homosexual.
And he was illegitimate, his mother was Princess Louise and his father was a stable boy called Alex Hanstein who later became Baron von Hanstein and the Count of Polzig. And Alex Hanstein was the illegitimate son of Baron Karl von Hanstein.
So we have Prince consort Albert being illegitimate, and being bigamously married to Queen Victoria, and then Prince Albert wore what was called a ‘Prince Albert’, which was a chain pierced through his penis, drawn up with a chain wrapped around his waist, so his penis was always vertical, but he couldn’t conceive a child.
So the conceptions for births that Queen Victoria did were done by Lionel Nathan Rothschild who was Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s son. So that meant that King Edward VII was the firstborn son officially, and he was born in a bigamous marriage and he was illegitimate as were the 9 official children of Queen Victoria.
[img(639.9969971179962px,288.9969971179962px)]http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3/images/Queen_Victoria_Prince_Albert_and_their_nine_children.jpg[/img]Queen Victoria's and Prince Consort Albert's
9 children were all illegitimate,
because Queen Victoria had never
divorced her first husband.
Queen Victoria had a son who was 6 ½ years older than King Edward VII and after she had finished breeding with Prince consort Albert, Prince consort Albert was killed in what was labeled ‘Pneumonia’, and then Queen Victoria took up a relationship with John Brown and had a daughter called Louise Brown.
So the 9 children were married quite young, generally about age 18, 19, to other princes right across Europe, and that created an illegitimate family tree in England and right across Europe. And illegitimacy is a common theme in the British Royal Family.
So, we’re faced with a situation where we have to question, why are they Royals, who are the Royals, and if we know that they are illegitimate, why are we obeying them, and is there another more legitimate Royal family, which there is, and I’ll talk about that in the next chapter.
So this theme of illegitimacy in the Royal Family carries on. The person who became King Edward VII, when he was the Prince of Wales, he married Princess Alexandra of Denmark. And they had a child, Prince Eddy, who was involved in the Jack the Ripper murders.
He married a catholic girl in a catholic church, and then she was obducted and the child was obducted – this is just glossing over briefly – and then Prince Eddy’s death was faked, he burned down two castles, first his death was faked, and then he was sent to Balmoral Castle. Then Prince Eddy was taken to Glamis Castle. It is called Glamis Castle everywhere else, but within an hours drive of Glamis Castle it is called Glance. And he was taken there in 1892, and he lived there at least until 1933, there is a photograph from him taken there.
(Google will not let me upload the photo, sorry, but go to the original link and you will recognize the king)
King George V was Danish and Russian
and not English.
So because his death was faked, his younger brother who became King George V, he was placed on the throne from 1910 to 1936. But King George V was illegitimate. King George V was the son of the Princess of Wales, Princess Alexandra, and the man who became Tsar Alexander III.
And that was actually done in a black moon month. And a black moon is when you have two no moons in the same month. And amongst the Wiccans, the Russians, the Danish and a lot of the Scandinavians, a Royal who is conceived in a black moon month is considered a true king.
So King George V of England, who reigned from 1910 to 1936, was Danish and Russian and not English. And King Edward VII, who reigned from 1901, 1902 til 1910, he was also illegitimate and from a bigamous marriage.
So that leaves us with a situation where there is an alternative Royal Family, and that that Royal Family is hidden, and we are looking at discussing that in another chapter.
Jörn:
Which is going to be part 2 of chapter 2.
Who were Queen Elizabeth II’s parents?
[img(639.9969971179962px,424.9969971179962px)]http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3/images/QEII_RealParents.gif[/img]The real parents of Princess Elizabeth were
'The Maid' of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (the 'Whipping Boy')
and Winston Churchill.
Greg:
King George V, who was Russian and Danish, gave birth to the person who became King George VI. King George VI had an IQ of 67, which is one point above retarded. He had knocked knees, he had a terrible stutter and he didn’t have an attention span long enough to be photographed, he just wandered off . . . So there is a movie made about that recently called ‘The King’s Speech’ which is a bunch of propaganda how he was an E for ‘Achievement’ and an A for ‘Try Hard’.
So he had a child with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the person called Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, and that was a boy, and that boy was epileptic and was left to die on the gurney. So it became a question whether they could allow King George VI, the person who was to become King George VI, to sire another child.
So he was replaced in favor of Winston Churchill, and Winston Churchill had been the Home Secretary, and he was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII, which meant that he still had royal blood and he was young enough to sire. Maybe we should go on to a little bit on Winston Churchill’s conception.
The person who was to become King Edward VII was notorious for his affairs. And he had an affair with Jenny Jerome Churchill. She was Jenny Jerome, she conceived with King Edward VII and then she immediately married Randolph Churchill, who then became the Master Magistrorum, which is the spiritual head of the Freemasons, based in the Royal Albert Lodge, which is in the base of Kensington Palace in London, which doubles as a nursery for illegitimate children.
Winston Churchill was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII and that’s why he was promoted so heavily. So Winston Churchill was brought in to sire a child with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon. However, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, before she was engaged to the man who became King George VI, she was engaged to the man who became King Edward VIII. Now King Edward VIII abdicated in 1936. He was crowned in 1936 in about January and he abdicated in December 1936. And he did absolutely everything he could to sabotage his rule.
Wallis Simpson was Androgen
Insensitivity Symptom Grade 4.
Here pictured with
King Edward VIII,
who abdicated.
Now, the person who became King Edward VIII married Wallis Simpson, who was three times divorced, absolutely sabotaged, and she was considered bisexual. She was considered a drug dealer, she was considered completely unsuitable, she was having affairs with every second second hand car salesman in London, and she was Androgen Insensitivity Symptom Grade 4, which means that she was conceived as a male, and didn’t quite fully transition into a female, which would be Grade 7. Grade 1 for male, Grade 7 is a female model.
So she had both bits, which King Edward VIII liked because he was bisexual himself. So when Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon became engaged to the person who became King Edward VIII, he said: “I am going to abdicate”. So a week later she was engaged to the person who became King George VI. She realized that he was one IQ point above retarded, had knocked knees, a terrible stutter, and just couldn’t really cope. So she swished herself, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon swished herself with her maid who was known as ‘The Whipping Boy’.
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon and her maid were both born in 1900, and in 1907, when they were about 7, they went to Ireland to a place around Galway or Waterford in County Waterford and found a girl of likeness, and ordered her in as a maid, and called her ‘The Whipping Boy’, because whenever Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon did anything wrong, the Whipping Boy would get the punishment.
So when Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was engaged to the person who became King Edward VI, she went – augh, I’m out of here. So she put the Whipping Boy in place, and Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon married someone else and moved to France and died around 1950 of a congenital heart condition, which her brother also died of at the same age.
So that meant that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon wasn’t, she was Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’s maid, and she had a child by artificial insemination – it was one of the first cases of artificial insemination – with Winston Churchill as the sperm donor.
And that was the only trace of royal blood. Winston Churchill was also the sperm donor for Princess Margaret. So during World War II Winston Churchill used to take Princess Elizabeth when she was 14 years old into the war room, and the other war cabinet ministers used to say “Why have you got Princess Elizabeth here” and Winston Churchill’s reply was “Well, the war might go on for another twenty years, she needs to be briefed”. But really it was, because Winston Churchill was the father of Princess Elizabeth.
Now if you look at Queen Elizabeth now walking around, she moves exactly the same as Winston Churchill and looks very very similar. But Winston Churchill’s deeds don’t stop there. And we probably talk about Winston Churchill and his affair with his daughter-in-law Pamela Digby Churchill, which resulted in a son.
He was born in 1946 and was transferred to America by RAF Supply Pilot Max Aitken II and that child grew up to become Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton is english, he is the biological son of Winston Churchill, he is the half-brother of Queen Elizabeth II and he is the grandson of King Edward VII, and King Edward VII’s byline was ‘The Peacemaker’, and Bill Clinton’s byline is ‘The Peacemaker’. So it just goes on and on and on. (VN: We had a blog that said that Bill was the illegit son of Winthrop Rockefeller and if you see a photo of Winthrop, you would see the resemblance, but that does not mean this being said here is not true, rather it now has two confirmed sources saying Bill is and was planned as an illegit son of one of these elites. It explains his sojourn into oxford which is the british home of almost all secret societies.)
[img(424.9969971179962px,282.9969971179962px)]http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3/images/Ex_Bertie.jpg[/img]
King Edward VII, also called 'Bertie',
was a son of Lionel Nathan Rothschild.
And part of the reason, going back earlier in time, that King Edward VIII abdicated was that he knew that his uncle Prince Eddy was still alive. His father King George V’s kingship from 1910 to 1936 was a fraud, because his older brother Prince Eddy was still alive.
So we’ve got illegitimate monarchs, and we’ve got fraudulent monarchs, and we’ve got them accepting that they are a fraud and running with it. So King George V was Danish and Russian, so he wasn’t legally a British Royal, and he married Mary of Teck and produced the person who became King Edward VIII and the person who became King George VI, and Mary of Teck was the only one out of that parentage who was supplying the royal blood.
So the royal blood from Queen Victoria’s second child, who is King Edward VII, who was known as ‘The Father of Europe’, his royal blood is vastly diminished. He was a quarter royal at most, and then by the time it came to King George V he was no royal at all, when it came to King George VI, he was only getting his royal blood from Mary of Teck who was the Queen consort.
When it came to Queen Elizabeth II, she was getting her royal blood a little bit from Mary of Teck, but just a tiny amount, and then via Winston Churchill, who had half the royal blood of King Edward VII who was illegitimate, bigamously born and was half-Rothschild and half Queen Victoria, who was also half-Rothschild.
So from King Edward VII on we have three quarter Rothschild blood (VN: Remember Rothschilds are Khazars, now so much makes sense) and one quarter royal blood, and it wasn’t the strong side of the royal bloodline.
What we have in existence now is a royal family which is existing outside of the current British Royal Family and is vastly more royal.
Jörn:
What has Prince Philip been involved in?
Read more »
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
No comments:
Pamphlets in Ukraine handed out during protests and pamphlets that were handed out in Egypt are Exactly the Same!
at 01:00 Posted by Vatic Master
Vatic Note: For me, and that is all I can speak for, this proves there has been an international, or global, if you will, hand in all these rebellions, and the first question always is...... "Follow the money!" Who benefited most from these rebellions? Its recently been stated that
Pamphlets in Ukraine handed out during protests and pamphlets that were handed out in Egypt are Exactly the Same!
http://12160.info/photo/photo/show?id=2649739%3APhoto%3A1376645&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_photo
by Site Admins, 12160.info, Dec 12, 2013
[img(735.9969971179962px,442.9969971179962px)]http://api.ning.com/files/6vIMLmuhUcrtFn4P3225qipBSISQHt4kysjoMBoFxRhFt0Zfuq1LPTyRXkx8emrSxMlsdeK8CdysKlHDE5Ku5Sn1lz9sdYxZ/PamphletsinUkrainehandedoutduringprotestsandpamphletsthatwerehandedoutinEgypt.png?width=737&height=443[/img]
The title says: Necessary clothes and equipment (or instruments)
The picture on the left is a pamphlet that was handed out during Tahrir Square protests in Egypt. Here is a full page doc on this picture (and higher res picture of the Egyptian pamphlet): http://publicintelligence.net/egyptian-revolution-protest-manual-how-to-protest-intelligently/
Here is another person holding same pamphlets together:http://zarodinu.org.ua/pics/ukraina.egipitskiy-scenariy.jpg
And here is the english version of this pamphlet: http://holykaw.alltop.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/20729863-media_httpfarm6static_bAeAu.jpg
[color][font]
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
[/font][/color]
Thanks to: http://vaticproject.blogspot.com
at 01:30 Posted by Vatic MasterVatic Note: Well, they certainly did not want this blog to go up. They won't let me upload the embedded on the video of the interview, they won't let me upload the photos of Edward the 5th, etc.... Where you may see gaps is where they would not let me upload. After reading it, I can see why. This is truly a mind blowing revelation of the British monarchy.
I wonder how the British people will take to this news. This below just proves that there are no elite at the top of their human refuse pile, simply smellier and filthier rogues with way less integrity than a street full of homeless people. I promise that is the feeling you get when you read about all the filthy things these criminals have done over the years. Major felony crimes, indeed.
How dare they think they can enslave the rest of us who are way more moralistic than anyone of them. This proves there is more class in the pinky finger of a working man than in the entire body of a royal. I can see why we got rid of them when we did. I can also now see there is no conflict in the protocols when it says they should plan on getting rid of the royals so the goyim have no leadership. Well, the royals they want to get rid of are those with no khazar blood.
Read this below, along with my VN:'s and then go to the link in the title and you can see and check out the photos they would not let up here on this blog. Truth is our WMD, and given the shenanigans of the so called British Royals who were really khazars, who have no idea what truth is; it does not surprise me that this is all coming back to haunt them like a bad dream.
This below spends a good deal of print showing the khazar blood lines within the royal family of Britain that originated with Nathan Rothschild, who has no royal blood, but has contributed to the royal line when called upon to do so.
Timing of it all is perfect too. The khazars saw the British they control as the way in to their dream of running this entire planet. Its interesting that the only way they could do that was through deception, lies, cheating, lack of integrity, no moral code, no conscience, and massive deception, drug running, pedophilia etc.
No wonder the khazars control and run Great Britain. Everything is a scam including who the royals truly are. Most of those in recent history, say the last couple of hundred years, have no royal blood in them. And those that do are exiled in some other part of the commonwealth.
History is not what we have been told or what we thought it was. Its amazing what we do not know. I am surprised this guy is still alive.
THE HALLETT REPORT No. 3
The History of the Illegitimate British Monarchy
http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3.html#.Uu7fQKHfu5m
by Jorn, of the Hallet Report
Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett talks in an interview with Jörn about the British Monarchy and the History of the British Monarchy, which shows that the current monarchy has no right to be on the Throne . . .
Text from the movie above
Transcript from the Interview on the 5th of November 2011 Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett, Jörn
Jörn:
Hello, my name is Jörn, and this is the first part of Chapter 2 of our interview together with author, historian and active history maker Greg Hallett from New Zealand. And in this chapter we are going to talk about the British Monarchy and the History of the British Monarchy. Today’s date is the 1st of November 2011.
Lord Hallett, can you please tell us about the British Monarchy in general.
Lord Chancellor Greg Hallett:
Perhaps we should start with Queen Victoria being named ‘The Grandmother of Europe’ and her son King Edward VII being named ‘The Father of Europe’. (New research to come . . .) Queen Victoria needed to sire a child, get married and sire a child with a legitimate prince, which she did.
The legal age for marriage and conception in those days was 12, and she was 14 when she conceived, got married and gave birth. She never divorced, and in a later chapter we will talk about who that prince was. She never divorced, and when she married Prince Consort Albert, it was a bigamous marriage, and Prince Consort Albert was a homosexual.
And he was illegitimate, his mother was Princess Louise and his father was a stable boy called Alex Hanstein who later became Baron von Hanstein and the Count of Polzig. And Alex Hanstein was the illegitimate son of Baron Karl von Hanstein.
So we have Prince consort Albert being illegitimate, and being bigamously married to Queen Victoria, and then Prince Albert wore what was called a ‘Prince Albert’, which was a chain pierced through his penis, drawn up with a chain wrapped around his waist, so his penis was always vertical, but he couldn’t conceive a child.
So the conceptions for births that Queen Victoria did were done by Lionel Nathan Rothschild who was Nathan Mayer Rothschild’s son. So that meant that King Edward VII was the firstborn son officially, and he was born in a bigamous marriage and he was illegitimate as were the 9 official children of Queen Victoria.
[img(639.9969971179962px,288.9969971179962px)]http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3/images/Queen_Victoria_Prince_Albert_and_their_nine_children.jpg[/img]Queen Victoria's and Prince Consort Albert's
9 children were all illegitimate,
because Queen Victoria had never
divorced her first husband.
Queen Victoria had a son who was 6 ½ years older than King Edward VII and after she had finished breeding with Prince consort Albert, Prince consort Albert was killed in what was labeled ‘Pneumonia’, and then Queen Victoria took up a relationship with John Brown and had a daughter called Louise Brown.
So the 9 children were married quite young, generally about age 18, 19, to other princes right across Europe, and that created an illegitimate family tree in England and right across Europe. And illegitimacy is a common theme in the British Royal Family.
So, we’re faced with a situation where we have to question, why are they Royals, who are the Royals, and if we know that they are illegitimate, why are we obeying them, and is there another more legitimate Royal family, which there is, and I’ll talk about that in the next chapter.
So this theme of illegitimacy in the Royal Family carries on. The person who became King Edward VII, when he was the Prince of Wales, he married Princess Alexandra of Denmark. And they had a child, Prince Eddy, who was involved in the Jack the Ripper murders.
He married a catholic girl in a catholic church, and then she was obducted and the child was obducted – this is just glossing over briefly – and then Prince Eddy’s death was faked, he burned down two castles, first his death was faked, and then he was sent to Balmoral Castle. Then Prince Eddy was taken to Glamis Castle. It is called Glamis Castle everywhere else, but within an hours drive of Glamis Castle it is called Glance. And he was taken there in 1892, and he lived there at least until 1933, there is a photograph from him taken there.
(Google will not let me upload the photo, sorry, but go to the original link and you will recognize the king)
King George V was Danish and Russian
and not English.
So because his death was faked, his younger brother who became King George V, he was placed on the throne from 1910 to 1936. But King George V was illegitimate. King George V was the son of the Princess of Wales, Princess Alexandra, and the man who became Tsar Alexander III.
And that was actually done in a black moon month. And a black moon is when you have two no moons in the same month. And amongst the Wiccans, the Russians, the Danish and a lot of the Scandinavians, a Royal who is conceived in a black moon month is considered a true king.
So King George V of England, who reigned from 1910 to 1936, was Danish and Russian and not English. And King Edward VII, who reigned from 1901, 1902 til 1910, he was also illegitimate and from a bigamous marriage.
So that leaves us with a situation where there is an alternative Royal Family, and that that Royal Family is hidden, and we are looking at discussing that in another chapter.
Jörn:
Which is going to be part 2 of chapter 2.
Who were Queen Elizabeth II’s parents?
[img(639.9969971179962px,424.9969971179962px)]http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3/images/QEII_RealParents.gif[/img]The real parents of Princess Elizabeth were
'The Maid' of Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon (the 'Whipping Boy')
and Winston Churchill.
Greg:
King George V, who was Russian and Danish, gave birth to the person who became King George VI. King George VI had an IQ of 67, which is one point above retarded. He had knocked knees, he had a terrible stutter and he didn’t have an attention span long enough to be photographed, he just wandered off . . . So there is a movie made about that recently called ‘The King’s Speech’ which is a bunch of propaganda how he was an E for ‘Achievement’ and an A for ‘Try Hard’.
So he had a child with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the person called Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, and that was a boy, and that boy was epileptic and was left to die on the gurney. So it became a question whether they could allow King George VI, the person who was to become King George VI, to sire another child.
So he was replaced in favor of Winston Churchill, and Winston Churchill had been the Home Secretary, and he was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII, which meant that he still had royal blood and he was young enough to sire. Maybe we should go on to a little bit on Winston Churchill’s conception.
The person who was to become King Edward VII was notorious for his affairs. And he had an affair with Jenny Jerome Churchill. She was Jenny Jerome, she conceived with King Edward VII and then she immediately married Randolph Churchill, who then became the Master Magistrorum, which is the spiritual head of the Freemasons, based in the Royal Albert Lodge, which is in the base of Kensington Palace in London, which doubles as a nursery for illegitimate children.
Winston Churchill was the illegitimate son of King Edward VII and that’s why he was promoted so heavily. So Winston Churchill was brought in to sire a child with Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon. However, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, before she was engaged to the man who became King George VI, she was engaged to the man who became King Edward VIII. Now King Edward VIII abdicated in 1936. He was crowned in 1936 in about January and he abdicated in December 1936. And he did absolutely everything he could to sabotage his rule.
Wallis Simpson was Androgen
Insensitivity Symptom Grade 4.
Here pictured with
King Edward VIII,
who abdicated.
Now, the person who became King Edward VIII married Wallis Simpson, who was three times divorced, absolutely sabotaged, and she was considered bisexual. She was considered a drug dealer, she was considered completely unsuitable, she was having affairs with every second second hand car salesman in London, and she was Androgen Insensitivity Symptom Grade 4, which means that she was conceived as a male, and didn’t quite fully transition into a female, which would be Grade 7. Grade 1 for male, Grade 7 is a female model.
So she had both bits, which King Edward VIII liked because he was bisexual himself. So when Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon became engaged to the person who became King Edward VIII, he said: “I am going to abdicate”. So a week later she was engaged to the person who became King George VI. She realized that he was one IQ point above retarded, had knocked knees, a terrible stutter, and just couldn’t really cope. So she swished herself, Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon swished herself with her maid who was known as ‘The Whipping Boy’.
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon and her maid were both born in 1900, and in 1907, when they were about 7, they went to Ireland to a place around Galway or Waterford in County Waterford and found a girl of likeness, and ordered her in as a maid, and called her ‘The Whipping Boy’, because whenever Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon did anything wrong, the Whipping Boy would get the punishment.
So when Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon was engaged to the person who became King Edward VI, she went – augh, I’m out of here. So she put the Whipping Boy in place, and Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon married someone else and moved to France and died around 1950 of a congenital heart condition, which her brother also died of at the same age.
So that meant that Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon wasn’t, she was Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon’s maid, and she had a child by artificial insemination – it was one of the first cases of artificial insemination – with Winston Churchill as the sperm donor.
And that was the only trace of royal blood. Winston Churchill was also the sperm donor for Princess Margaret. So during World War II Winston Churchill used to take Princess Elizabeth when she was 14 years old into the war room, and the other war cabinet ministers used to say “Why have you got Princess Elizabeth here” and Winston Churchill’s reply was “Well, the war might go on for another twenty years, she needs to be briefed”. But really it was, because Winston Churchill was the father of Princess Elizabeth.
Now if you look at Queen Elizabeth now walking around, she moves exactly the same as Winston Churchill and looks very very similar. But Winston Churchill’s deeds don’t stop there. And we probably talk about Winston Churchill and his affair with his daughter-in-law Pamela Digby Churchill, which resulted in a son.
He was born in 1946 and was transferred to America by RAF Supply Pilot Max Aitken II and that child grew up to become Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton is english, he is the biological son of Winston Churchill, he is the half-brother of Queen Elizabeth II and he is the grandson of King Edward VII, and King Edward VII’s byline was ‘The Peacemaker’, and Bill Clinton’s byline is ‘The Peacemaker’. So it just goes on and on and on. (VN: We had a blog that said that Bill was the illegit son of Winthrop Rockefeller and if you see a photo of Winthrop, you would see the resemblance, but that does not mean this being said here is not true, rather it now has two confirmed sources saying Bill is and was planned as an illegit son of one of these elites. It explains his sojourn into oxford which is the british home of almost all secret societies.)
[img(424.9969971179962px,282.9969971179962px)]http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No3/images/Ex_Bertie.jpg[/img]
King Edward VII, also called 'Bertie',
was a son of Lionel Nathan Rothschild.
And part of the reason, going back earlier in time, that King Edward VIII abdicated was that he knew that his uncle Prince Eddy was still alive. His father King George V’s kingship from 1910 to 1936 was a fraud, because his older brother Prince Eddy was still alive.
So we’ve got illegitimate monarchs, and we’ve got fraudulent monarchs, and we’ve got them accepting that they are a fraud and running with it. So King George V was Danish and Russian, so he wasn’t legally a British Royal, and he married Mary of Teck and produced the person who became King Edward VIII and the person who became King George VI, and Mary of Teck was the only one out of that parentage who was supplying the royal blood.
So the royal blood from Queen Victoria’s second child, who is King Edward VII, who was known as ‘The Father of Europe’, his royal blood is vastly diminished. He was a quarter royal at most, and then by the time it came to King George V he was no royal at all, when it came to King George VI, he was only getting his royal blood from Mary of Teck who was the Queen consort.
When it came to Queen Elizabeth II, she was getting her royal blood a little bit from Mary of Teck, but just a tiny amount, and then via Winston Churchill, who had half the royal blood of King Edward VII who was illegitimate, bigamously born and was half-Rothschild and half Queen Victoria, who was also half-Rothschild.
So from King Edward VII on we have three quarter Rothschild blood (VN: Remember Rothschilds are Khazars, now so much makes sense) and one quarter royal blood, and it wasn’t the strong side of the royal bloodline.
What we have in existence now is a royal family which is existing outside of the current British Royal Family and is vastly more royal.
Jörn:
What has Prince Philip been involved in?
Read more »
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
No comments:
| Reactions: |
Pamphlets in Ukraine handed out during protests and pamphlets that were handed out in Egypt are Exactly the Same!
at 01:00 Posted by Vatic MasterVatic Note: For me, and that is all I can speak for, this proves there has been an international, or global, if you will, hand in all these rebellions, and the first question always is...... "Follow the money!" Who benefited most from these rebellions? Its recently been stated that
Pamphlets in Ukraine handed out during protests and pamphlets that were handed out in Egypt are Exactly the Same!
http://12160.info/photo/photo/show?id=2649739%3APhoto%3A1376645&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_photo
by Site Admins, 12160.info, Dec 12, 2013
[img(735.9969971179962px,442.9969971179962px)]http://api.ning.com/files/6vIMLmuhUcrtFn4P3225qipBSISQHt4kysjoMBoFxRhFt0Zfuq1LPTyRXkx8emrSxMlsdeK8CdysKlHDE5Ku5Sn1lz9sdYxZ/PamphletsinUkrainehandedoutduringprotestsandpamphletsthatwerehandedoutinEgypt.png?width=737&height=443[/img]
The title says: Necessary clothes and equipment (or instruments)
The picture on the left is a pamphlet that was handed out during Tahrir Square protests in Egypt. Here is a full page doc on this picture (and higher res picture of the Egyptian pamphlet): http://publicintelligence.net/egyptian-revolution-protest-manual-how-to-protest-intelligently/
Here is another person holding same pamphlets together:http://zarodinu.org.ua/pics/ukraina.egipitskiy-scenariy.jpg
And here is the english version of this pamphlet: http://holykaw.alltop.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/20729863-media_httpfarm6static_bAeAu.jpg
[color][font]
The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
[/font][/color]
Thanks to: http://vaticproject.blogspot.com
