Most of you know I am always seeking more knowledge on the RH- blood type factor. What you may not know is that on the many polls I have put up an several sites show that over 80% are of RH- blood type. I would venture a guess that those that were not have a genetic marker to the neg type.
It occurred to me that I have never polled this group.....
So..... Do you know your blood type?
The cyberscum changed this time schedule for this blog to today at 4 am.... while I had it scheduled for tomorrow or Monday at 4 am. At 3:30 am this morning, I got up and checked and the schedule at that time was as I had put it up, but after I went back to bed, they changed it. That means they either wanted to hide the 4 am article that we did schedule that is listed before this one, on creating unlimited human populations with the characteristics they want from us like no resistance, OR they did not want this one on the busiest day of the week for us which is Sunday, and so put this up since they seem to care about the RH issue at this point given their behavior with collecting everyones DNA. OR BOTH....
I just read that 15% of the population is RH Neg, BUT 60% of european population has RH NEG alleles but are listed as Positive for the RH factor, yet contain the characteristics of the recessive Neg gene. So 60% of the european population contain RH neg traits, which the scumbag vampire squids will simply genetically engineer it out of the population based on the article just before this one. Clever little manipulators. That means they are telling us the article before this one is a definite real problem for them since it must be true and they confirm it by messing with it. Thanks cyberscum for telling us. They are still messing with this. I have had to go back and got into html to fix the type setting. They keep making it too small read. Wow. That tells you these two articles are not making them very happy, that means they are a must read. LOL If they screw with the bold again, just ignore it and read. Thanks for putting up with all of this. It does get old.
Vatic Note: Well, as you can see, I am going down another rabbithole with respect to the RH neg blood. This one was fascinating and deeply extensive. This is a woman who discovered her own RH neg situation and began doing years of research and has written a book. I am doing this in many parts, adding to the first 3 blogs we have done, so it will be a series. This batch deals with the various explanations for the RH blood that has been floated out there. She had researched and given the pros and cons of why this could or could not be the explanation. So far as I have read, she has done a pretty good job and with just a touch of humor. These will not be put up in order they appear in her book, rather, by category. Aliens being the first category. She includes writings by Edgar Cayce in this as well as the Bible. Lots to digest, since I found her providing Cayces writings very very interesting.
Given the research I have done and placed up here on the board, I have found that its almost impossible that the RH neg is a mutation. Even mutations are a result of something within the system already existing that mutated or a throw back if you will. A total lack of the RH positive means that it was "not" mutated, rather, like Mules, its a result of two different species mating. Further no primate in nature has ever mutated that blood element out of existance. Remember, we proved all mammals have the RH positive, and none have a neg on their blood type. So that is one place where I disagree with her and found her research weak. That can be for a whole other discussion.
Enjoy the read of archeological finds of the nefilim and the shocking size of these people. Remember, we have not even discussed the Annanaki, or the dragos or reptilians yet, but somehow I do not believe the dragos are the Rh neg hybrids unless there is a hybrid between the aliens themselves. Now, THAT is an interesting thought. Another rabbit hole. lol As I continually say, read what we have found and make up your own mind. Personally with what I have found, I, personally have concluded three "nots" so far...2 of which match her research, we only disagree so far on the mutation theory. in other words what it is NOT, and that is the mutation theory, the neanderthal theory and the drago theory.
It occurred to me that I have never polled this group.....
So..... Do you know your blood type?
The cyberscum changed this time schedule for this blog to today at 4 am.... while I had it scheduled for tomorrow or Monday at 4 am. At 3:30 am this morning, I got up and checked and the schedule at that time was as I had put it up, but after I went back to bed, they changed it. That means they either wanted to hide the 4 am article that we did schedule that is listed before this one, on creating unlimited human populations with the characteristics they want from us like no resistance, OR they did not want this one on the busiest day of the week for us which is Sunday, and so put this up since they seem to care about the RH issue at this point given their behavior with collecting everyones DNA. OR BOTH....
I just read that 15% of the population is RH Neg, BUT 60% of european population has RH NEG alleles but are listed as Positive for the RH factor, yet contain the characteristics of the recessive Neg gene. So 60% of the european population contain RH neg traits, which the scumbag vampire squids will simply genetically engineer it out of the population based on the article just before this one. Clever little manipulators. That means they are telling us the article before this one is a definite real problem for them since it must be true and they confirm it by messing with it. Thanks cyberscum for telling us. They are still messing with this. I have had to go back and got into html to fix the type setting. They keep making it too small read. Wow. That tells you these two articles are not making them very happy, that means they are a must read. LOL If they screw with the bold again, just ignore it and read. Thanks for putting up with all of this. It does get old.
Vatic Note: Well, as you can see, I am going down another rabbithole with respect to the RH neg blood. This one was fascinating and deeply extensive. This is a woman who discovered her own RH neg situation and began doing years of research and has written a book. I am doing this in many parts, adding to the first 3 blogs we have done, so it will be a series. This batch deals with the various explanations for the RH blood that has been floated out there. She had researched and given the pros and cons of why this could or could not be the explanation. So far as I have read, she has done a pretty good job and with just a touch of humor. These will not be put up in order they appear in her book, rather, by category. Aliens being the first category. She includes writings by Edgar Cayce in this as well as the Bible. Lots to digest, since I found her providing Cayces writings very very interesting.
Given the research I have done and placed up here on the board, I have found that its almost impossible that the RH neg is a mutation. Even mutations are a result of something within the system already existing that mutated or a throw back if you will. A total lack of the RH positive means that it was "not" mutated, rather, like Mules, its a result of two different species mating. Further no primate in nature has ever mutated that blood element out of existance. Remember, we proved all mammals have the RH positive, and none have a neg on their blood type. So that is one place where I disagree with her and found her research weak. That can be for a whole other discussion.
Enjoy the read of archeological finds of the nefilim and the shocking size of these people. Remember, we have not even discussed the Annanaki, or the dragos or reptilians yet, but somehow I do not believe the dragos are the Rh neg hybrids unless there is a hybrid between the aliens themselves. Now, THAT is an interesting thought. Another rabbit hole. lol As I continually say, read what we have found and make up your own mind. Personally with what I have found, I, personally have concluded three "nots" so far...2 of which match her research, we only disagree so far on the mutation theory. in other words what it is NOT, and that is the mutation theory, the neanderthal theory and the drago theory.