Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Eric Williams addresses the characterization of birth certificates as being legal fictions
Posted on June 25, 2014 by Jean
Alfred notes that -
Your statement/s have been published at:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2014/06/eric-williams-sovereignty-personal-freedom-and-the-grand-jury.html?cid=6a00d8341c73dd53ef01a3fd258337970b#comment-6a00d8341c73dd53ef01a3fd258337970b
Hi Alfred [Lambremont Webre],
Something has been bothering me about your characterization of birth certificates as being legal fictions. I had never considered such to be the case. Birth certificates are created as the record of the birth of a human baby and are, for the most part, an accurate record of the parents and the name assigned to the child. None of that is fictional. The fact that the child contributes nothing to the creation thereof and has no ability to acquire personal knowledge of the creation at the time of creation does not cause the creation to be fictional. The fact that the birth certificates are recorded with the state is not fictional. The fact that the names entered thereon are valuable is not fictional. The fact that parents do not enter an ownership claim of the name entered on the birth certificate is not fictional. The fact that all the states have abandoned property statutes is not fictional. The fact that each state becomes the owner of the names after a term of years is not fictional. The fact that the child can not possibly acquire a legal ownership of the name is not fictional. The fact that when the child becomes sixteen years of age and presents that birth certificate to the state to be issued a driver license is not fictional. The fact that the state has no standing to require the sixteen year old to procure a driver license until after the sixteen year old voluntarily submits himself to subservience to the state is not fictional. The fact that the state uses the driver license ploy to seduce sixteen year old young adults into a situation where the young adult unknowingly applies to the state for the state to issue the young adult a franchise license to use the name on the birth certificate as the young adult’s “true legal name” is not fictional. The fact that this ceremony causes the young adult to unknowingly surrender the young adult’s Naturally acquired individual sovereignty and to enter into a condition of political servitude to the state is not fictional.
So Alfred, where is there any part of the foregoing that constitutes a “legal fiction”?
The fact that the state manipulates all of the foregoing constitutes intentional criminal fraud on the part of the state is clearly self evident and undeniable, but how is that fictional.
I consulted with two online dictionaries for “legal fiction”:
Legal Fiction:
“An assumption that something occurred or someone or something exists which, in fact, is not the case, but that is made in the law to enable a court to equitably resolve a matter before it.”
Law Dictionary: What is LEGAL FICTION? definition of LEGAL FICTION (Black’s Law Dictionary)
What is LEGAL FICTION?
“Believing or assuming something not true is true. Used in judicial reasoning for avoiding issues where a new situation comes up against the law, changing how the law is applied, but not changing the text of the law.”
This is why I insist on referring to the birth certificate driver license ploy as criminal.
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
Thanks to: http://jhaines6.wordpress.com
Posted on June 25, 2014 by Jean
Alfred notes that -
Your statement/s have been published at:
http://exopolitics.blogs.com/breaking_news/2014/06/eric-williams-sovereignty-personal-freedom-and-the-grand-jury.html?cid=6a00d8341c73dd53ef01a3fd258337970b#comment-6a00d8341c73dd53ef01a3fd258337970b
Hi Alfred [Lambremont Webre],
Something has been bothering me about your characterization of birth certificates as being legal fictions. I had never considered such to be the case. Birth certificates are created as the record of the birth of a human baby and are, for the most part, an accurate record of the parents and the name assigned to the child. None of that is fictional. The fact that the child contributes nothing to the creation thereof and has no ability to acquire personal knowledge of the creation at the time of creation does not cause the creation to be fictional. The fact that the birth certificates are recorded with the state is not fictional. The fact that the names entered thereon are valuable is not fictional. The fact that parents do not enter an ownership claim of the name entered on the birth certificate is not fictional. The fact that all the states have abandoned property statutes is not fictional. The fact that each state becomes the owner of the names after a term of years is not fictional. The fact that the child can not possibly acquire a legal ownership of the name is not fictional. The fact that when the child becomes sixteen years of age and presents that birth certificate to the state to be issued a driver license is not fictional. The fact that the state has no standing to require the sixteen year old to procure a driver license until after the sixteen year old voluntarily submits himself to subservience to the state is not fictional. The fact that the state uses the driver license ploy to seduce sixteen year old young adults into a situation where the young adult unknowingly applies to the state for the state to issue the young adult a franchise license to use the name on the birth certificate as the young adult’s “true legal name” is not fictional. The fact that this ceremony causes the young adult to unknowingly surrender the young adult’s Naturally acquired individual sovereignty and to enter into a condition of political servitude to the state is not fictional.
So Alfred, where is there any part of the foregoing that constitutes a “legal fiction”?
The fact that the state manipulates all of the foregoing constitutes intentional criminal fraud on the part of the state is clearly self evident and undeniable, but how is that fictional.
I consulted with two online dictionaries for “legal fiction”:
Legal Fiction:
“An assumption that something occurred or someone or something exists which, in fact, is not the case, but that is made in the law to enable a court to equitably resolve a matter before it.”
Law Dictionary: What is LEGAL FICTION? definition of LEGAL FICTION (Black’s Law Dictionary)
What is LEGAL FICTION?
“Believing or assuming something not true is true. Used in judicial reasoning for avoiding issues where a new situation comes up against the law, changing how the law is applied, but not changing the text of the law.”
This is why I insist on referring to the birth certificate driver license ploy as criminal.
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
Thanks to: http://jhaines6.wordpress.com
