Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
← Andy Rooney and Prayer – Pray if you want to!
On Dec 27, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Kirk MacKenzie wrote:
UNTYING THE GORDIAN KNOT
THE DEBTOR CHAINS THAT ENSLAVE
Michael Tellinger and Promissory Notes
People worldwide are waking up and attempting to unravel the parallel system erected by the banksters to enslave us. Michael Tellinger of South Africa is an erudite and well-spoken person. He not only acknowledges the problem, he offers self-generated Promissory Notes as a possible solution to end the downward debt spiral we are in, a recommendation he evolved out of 4 years experience in court.
The One Peoples Public Trust (OPPT)
During his discussion, Michael encourages people to free themselves by joining the One People Public Trust (OPPT), filed in Washington D.C., under UCC regulations, by a number of people, as a universal trust all can use. Here are links to study this topic further:
o A link to get you started
o Download the original UCC filings in zip format
o View and download the Commercial Bill
o View and download the True Bill
o View and download the most recent UCC Filing 2012127907
Karl Lentz and Common Law
In a related area, it was suggested I view the first 7 segments of Karl Lentz’s presentation on jurisdiction. In them, he makes a case for the absolute necessity of restoring our right to have matters at equity in excess of $25 resolved according to the People’s laws, not the king’s laws, and explains how he accomplishes that. Here is the link to the first segment, from which links to the remaining segments can be found. During the course of his presentation, Karl references Articles 7, 9, and 10 of the Bill of Rights.
It is useful to recall a little of the history of common law taken from prior presentations and Citizens Newswires.
As Originally Defined
“Common law. As distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs; and, in this sense, particularly the ancient unwritten law of England (the Magna Charta). The ‘common law’ is all the statutory and case law background of England and the American colonies before the American revolution.” — Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition
In other words, common law is what the People determine it to be, not the kings. As explained in Article 7 of the Bill of Rights, the People’s decisions are final, and not subject to government review: “In suits at equity, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.“
Had this principle been adhered to, it would have been impossible for government to overthrow our rights, property, culture, beliefs.
As Overthrown
It was Justice Brandeis, during the FDR administration, that assaulted this centuries old standard by changing the definition of common law to mean governments’ laws. Henceforth, common law would be what government and the courts decided, not the People.
“…federal courts exercising jurisdiction on the ground of diversity of citizenship need not, in matters of general jurisprudence, apply the unwritten law [common law] of the state [the People] as declared by its highest court; that they are free to exercise an independent judgment as to what the common law of the state [the federal United States] is-or should be … There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a state whether they be local in their nature or ‘general,’ be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. … The common law so far as it is enforced in a State, whether called common law or not, is not the common law generally but the law of that State existing by the authority of that State without regard to what it may have been in England or anywhere else … The authority and only authority is the State…” –Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304US64 (1938)
Decide For Yourself
There are lots of interesting and useful ideas and information contained in the links above. As usual, these are provided for your consideration, not as an endorsement.
Kirk MacKenzie
Kirk@SilentNoMorePublications.com
————————————————————————————————————–
Citizens Newswire is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won’t hear on TV.
It spans a wide array of topics regarding the future of our world. Unsubscribe by
clicking the link below and following the directions, or by emailing me a request.
————————————————————————————————————–
Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com
Michael Tellinger and Promissory Notes
Posted on December 27, 2014 by arnierosnerOn Dec 27, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Kirk MacKenzie
UNTYING THE GORDIAN KNOT
THE DEBTOR CHAINS THAT ENSLAVE
Michael Tellinger and Promissory Notes
People worldwide are waking up and attempting to unravel the parallel system erected by the banksters to enslave us. Michael Tellinger of South Africa is an erudite and well-spoken person. He not only acknowledges the problem, he offers self-generated Promissory Notes as a possible solution to end the downward debt spiral we are in, a recommendation he evolved out of 4 years experience in court.
The One Peoples Public Trust (OPPT)
During his discussion, Michael encourages people to free themselves by joining the One People Public Trust (OPPT), filed in Washington D.C., under UCC regulations, by a number of people, as a universal trust all can use. Here are links to study this topic further:
o A link to get you started
o Download the original UCC filings in zip format
o View and download the Commercial Bill
o View and download the True Bill
o View and download the most recent UCC Filing 2012127907
Karl Lentz and Common Law
In a related area, it was suggested I view the first 7 segments of Karl Lentz’s presentation on jurisdiction. In them, he makes a case for the absolute necessity of restoring our right to have matters at equity in excess of $25 resolved according to the People’s laws, not the king’s laws, and explains how he accomplishes that. Here is the link to the first segment, from which links to the remaining segments can be found. During the course of his presentation, Karl references Articles 7, 9, and 10 of the Bill of Rights.
It is useful to recall a little of the history of common law taken from prior presentations and Citizens Newswires.
As Originally Defined
“Common law. As distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs; and, in this sense, particularly the ancient unwritten law of England (the Magna Charta). The ‘common law’ is all the statutory and case law background of England and the American colonies before the American revolution.” — Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition
In other words, common law is what the People determine it to be, not the kings. As explained in Article 7 of the Bill of Rights, the People’s decisions are final, and not subject to government review: “In suits at equity, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.“
Had this principle been adhered to, it would have been impossible for government to overthrow our rights, property, culture, beliefs.
As Overthrown
It was Justice Brandeis, during the FDR administration, that assaulted this centuries old standard by changing the definition of common law to mean governments’ laws. Henceforth, common law would be what government and the courts decided, not the People.
“…federal courts exercising jurisdiction on the ground of diversity of citizenship need not, in matters of general jurisprudence, apply the unwritten law [common law] of the state [the People] as declared by its highest court; that they are free to exercise an independent judgment as to what the common law of the state [the federal United States] is-or should be … There is no federal general common law. Congress has no power to declare substantive rules of common law applicable in a state whether they be local in their nature or ‘general,’ be they commercial law or a part of the law of torts. … The common law so far as it is enforced in a State, whether called common law or not, is not the common law generally but the law of that State existing by the authority of that State without regard to what it may have been in England or anywhere else … The authority and only authority is the State…” –Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304US64 (1938)
Decide For Yourself
There are lots of interesting and useful ideas and information contained in the links above. As usual, these are provided for your consideration, not as an endorsement.
Kirk MacKenzie
Kirk@SilentNoMorePublications.com
————————————————————————————————————–
Citizens Newswire is a free, volunteer digest of news & views you won’t hear on TV.
It spans a wide array of topics regarding the future of our world. Unsubscribe by
clicking the link below and following the directions, or by emailing me a request.
————————————————————————————————————–
Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com
