Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Five Chinese Naval Ships off Coast of Alaska And More News
Please note: The information for the articles below come from The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times. Therefore it's not something that Mike Adams from Natural News conjured up...
Five Chinese naval ships spotted operating off the coast of Alaska - Wall Street Journal
Following all the back-and-forth explosions mentioned above, we now have the Wall Street Journal reporting that Chinese naval ships are being spotted off the coast of Alaska.
From the WSJ on Wednesday, Sep. 2:
Five Chinese navy ships are currently operating in the Bering Sea off the coast of Alaska, Pentagon officials said Wednesday, marking the first time the U.S. military has seen them in the area. The officials have been tracking the movements in recent days of three Chinese combat ships...
Note carefully that these are, according to the WSJ, "Chinese combat ships." Their presence so close to the continental United States is yet another escalation of kinetic warfare posturing between the two nations. (Don't forget that just a few months ago, Russian nuclear bombers were also spotted making "practice runs" toward Alaska.)
China unveils Mach 10 "carrier killer" cruise missile that renders U.S. carriers tactically obsolete
On top of all this, China has just unveiled a Mach 10 cruise missile that can destroy U.S. aircraft carriers, thereby rendering them all but obsolete in the modern theater of war.
From the Financial Times, Sep. 2, 2015:
A weapon so secret China would not reveal it for years will make its first public appearance in a military parade on Thursday, Chinese defence experts say.
The so-called "carrier-killer" missile that threatens to reshape the balance of power in the western Pacific is set to wheel through the centre of Beijing along with 12,000 troops and 500 tanks and other vehicles as China marks the 70th anniversary of the end of the second world war.
Like an intercontinental ballistic missile, the DF-21D goes into orbit, but after re-entering the atmosphere it is capable of manoeuvring on to a target, making it theoretically capable of landing a large warhead on or near a moving ship.
Some analysts say such missiles threaten to consign aircraft carriers -- which form the basis of current US naval strategy -- to the dustbin, just as aircraft carriers themselves did to battleships with Japan’s 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor.
What especially fascinating about this is that I wrote a weapons analysis document just 10 days ago that described the capabilities of orbital weapon systems as being very similar to what the Financial Times has now stated about China's Mach 10 cruise missile.
From my analysis published August 23, 2015:
A higher density "rod" weapon designed with exotic materials and dropped from high Earth orbit would obviously arrive on target at some velocity higher than 1km/s, but we don't know how much higher. Conservatively, let's estimate four times the velocity of an artillery shell, or 4km/s. In case you're curious, this is roughly Mach 12.
...Once the rod reaches atmosphere, small changes in control surfaces could easily glide the rod to within 2 meters of any intended target on impact, using the exact same technology that already exists in precision munitions on Earth (tiny adjustable surfaces near the tail).
China's new Dongfeng (meaning "East Wind", and pronounced like "Dong Fong" for those who wish to speak Chinese) cruise missile also launches into orbit, cruises through the atmosphere at Mach 10, and is precision guided to strike any land-based target within its range.
Based on the fact that this technology is openly admitted to exist in China, does anybody really think the Pentagon doesn't already have weapons that meet or exceed these capabilities?
Furthermore, does any intelligent person really believe this string of industrial explosions is sheer coincidence?
Of course they aren't. The U.S. and China are already engaged in the preliminary stages of war, folks. It just hasn't been announced yet. Just as importantly, both China and the United States possess and are using advanced weapon systems whose operational details aren't publicly known yet.
Warfare in 2015 isn't the same as warfare in 1942. In fact, it's so different that most people don't even recognize when it has already begun.
PREDICTION: Watch for yet more war posturing, currency devaluation moves, debt dumping attacks, cyber warfare, strategic hacking and "unexplained" explosions throughout the remainder of 2015. These are not random events. They are all part of the war with China that has already begun.
Thanks to Ari at: http://shatteringthematrix.com
- Posted by Ari on September 3, 2015 at 4:17pm in Governments & Financial Institutes and their Agendas
- Send Message View Discussions
Please note: The information for the articles below come from The Wall Street Journal and Financial Times. Therefore it's not something that Mike Adams from Natural News conjured up...
Five Chinese naval ships spotted operating off the coast of Alaska - Wall Street Journal
Following all the back-and-forth explosions mentioned above, we now have the Wall Street Journal reporting that Chinese naval ships are being spotted off the coast of Alaska.
From the WSJ on Wednesday, Sep. 2:
Five Chinese navy ships are currently operating in the Bering Sea off the coast of Alaska, Pentagon officials said Wednesday, marking the first time the U.S. military has seen them in the area. The officials have been tracking the movements in recent days of three Chinese combat ships...
Note carefully that these are, according to the WSJ, "Chinese combat ships." Their presence so close to the continental United States is yet another escalation of kinetic warfare posturing between the two nations. (Don't forget that just a few months ago, Russian nuclear bombers were also spotted making "practice runs" toward Alaska.)
China unveils Mach 10 "carrier killer" cruise missile that renders U.S. carriers tactically obsolete
On top of all this, China has just unveiled a Mach 10 cruise missile that can destroy U.S. aircraft carriers, thereby rendering them all but obsolete in the modern theater of war.
From the Financial Times, Sep. 2, 2015:
A weapon so secret China would not reveal it for years will make its first public appearance in a military parade on Thursday, Chinese defence experts say.
The so-called "carrier-killer" missile that threatens to reshape the balance of power in the western Pacific is set to wheel through the centre of Beijing along with 12,000 troops and 500 tanks and other vehicles as China marks the 70th anniversary of the end of the second world war.
Like an intercontinental ballistic missile, the DF-21D goes into orbit, but after re-entering the atmosphere it is capable of manoeuvring on to a target, making it theoretically capable of landing a large warhead on or near a moving ship.
Some analysts say such missiles threaten to consign aircraft carriers -- which form the basis of current US naval strategy -- to the dustbin, just as aircraft carriers themselves did to battleships with Japan’s 1941 attack on Pearl Harbor.
What especially fascinating about this is that I wrote a weapons analysis document just 10 days ago that described the capabilities of orbital weapon systems as being very similar to what the Financial Times has now stated about China's Mach 10 cruise missile.
From my analysis published August 23, 2015:
A higher density "rod" weapon designed with exotic materials and dropped from high Earth orbit would obviously arrive on target at some velocity higher than 1km/s, but we don't know how much higher. Conservatively, let's estimate four times the velocity of an artillery shell, or 4km/s. In case you're curious, this is roughly Mach 12.
...Once the rod reaches atmosphere, small changes in control surfaces could easily glide the rod to within 2 meters of any intended target on impact, using the exact same technology that already exists in precision munitions on Earth (tiny adjustable surfaces near the tail).
China's new Dongfeng (meaning "East Wind", and pronounced like "Dong Fong" for those who wish to speak Chinese) cruise missile also launches into orbit, cruises through the atmosphere at Mach 10, and is precision guided to strike any land-based target within its range.
Based on the fact that this technology is openly admitted to exist in China, does anybody really think the Pentagon doesn't already have weapons that meet or exceed these capabilities?
Furthermore, does any intelligent person really believe this string of industrial explosions is sheer coincidence?
Of course they aren't. The U.S. and China are already engaged in the preliminary stages of war, folks. It just hasn't been announced yet. Just as importantly, both China and the United States possess and are using advanced weapon systems whose operational details aren't publicly known yet.
Warfare in 2015 isn't the same as warfare in 1942. In fact, it's so different that most people don't even recognize when it has already begun.
PREDICTION: Watch for yet more war posturing, currency devaluation moves, debt dumping attacks, cyber warfare, strategic hacking and "unexplained" explosions throughout the remainder of 2015. These are not random events. They are all part of the war with China that has already begun.
And please watch this video, information that adds to the "weirdness". What do they know or what are they "pushing"?
September Begins/Military Aviation AlertThanks to Ari at: http://shatteringthematrix.com
