MORE CITIES ON PLUTO!
February 29, 2016 ·
by TS Caladan
Would you like to see what this astronomer thinks is the most astounding, unbelievable example of intelligent life in our Solar System? Certainly it’s not on Earth. It might not be the usual suspects of Mars, the Moon, Venus, Europa, Titan or Iapetus (written about extensively). Would it surprise you that it be lowly, de-classified, ‘dwarf,’ basically NOT A PLANET, in other words: Pluto!
Note NASA lies in first photo! Incredible LIES from NASA, JPL, which will be 100% proven as lies in the upcoming clip that YOU MUST SEE. There is a literal WHITEWASHING done to top photo that contains the ‘NASA’ logo in upper right. Let’s list the natural formations federal authorities tell us are on the surface of Pluto in an area called ‘Sputnik Planum.’
- troughs
- dark material within troughs
- hills
- pitted surfaces
See the patterns in above photo, which was first released upside-down. Now upright, we get a better view many have compared to honest-to-goodness ‘cities’ on the order of farmlands with the various rectangle shapes. I even compared Pluto’s surface to ‘suburbia’ where if you pulled far enough back, will show surrounding country in those same rectilinear patterns.
What they really are might soon be revealed to you if you jump to the 7:43 minute mark of the following YouTube. When I saw this…my mouth dropped!
WATCH THE YOUTUBE CLIP
YT clip blew my mind. I already wrote about the shocker of ‘Cities on Pluto’ on W-M before I came across this particular one. I think it is tremendous work cleaning up the whitewash or removing the BS that NASA hands us in top photo. They have layered a false surface, a fake NATURAL one, on top of dark contrasts shown in the clip. I had to write a comment in YT:
“When REAL amazing things hit our senses, we refuse to believe them. Our old, foggy, programmed mind will not believe what our eyes are plainly seeing. Cities, bases, are not anomalies – they’re on just about every solid planet and moon! I call the darkened ‘platforms’ Parking Garages! Maybe abandoned Parking Garages? Love how you seem to be able to walk down to the lower levels. Maybe it’s a Mall? Where did we park the spaceship? Love it. – don’t diss this…you know how rare it is to see the Truth these days?”
At this time, I found no pictures of the very deep, dark contrast-photos seen in this relatively new video. I’m sure they will be posted in near future. Till then, we have this shot of same area, with a slightly darker contrast. Download the picture, hit ‘edit,’ zoom IN closely and see a bit of the real view below the whiteness and crap of a ‘natural terrain.’
Again…see the clip and his reasoning and techniques all the way through. This is a sophisticated program where he shows the rectangles are not pixilation, obviously. They are DIFFERENT, completely different shapes than the uniform pixilation of your television screen. See it for yourself. Share this information…
Note first photo one more time. NASA, interestingly enough, points out the rectilinear shapes seen in light grey color against even a lighter color. Possibly, they had no choice: if we were going to receive good photos of Pluto (bleached as they are) the grey ‘squared’ areas had to appear. [Look how prominent they are in deep contrast of Black]. How to explain them? AH!
NASA feeds us “irregularly-shaped segments” seen printed on their photo as an answer to those ‘dog-gone,’ pesky SQUARE things. Pixels at an angle are not an explanation. Federal officials tell us what they are:
They’re irregular segments; they’re nothing; don’t worry about them.
They used to simply BLUR something out. Now, they’re getting very good at masking the truth. Why can’t NASA take us through the various contrast tones and show us the real investigations and actual analysis in depth? Let’s see all angles. Let’s see color variations that enhance unseen details. Never! We barely receive a color photograph.
They used to simply BLUR something out. Now, they’re getting very good at masking the truth. Why can’t NASA take us through the various contrast tones and show us the real investigations and actual analysis in depth? Let’s see all angles. Let’s see color variations that enhance unseen details. Never! We barely receive a color photograph.
Go back and view the clip again and see if you can spot the above location after that 7:43 mark with dark contrast. I view the entire Sputnik Planum area as roofs, roofs of the ‘parking garages’ (really some type of habitats). The square indicated by Red Arrow might be on top of a very large, underground superstructure. I was reminded of a bright “X” or square area painted on a roof for a helicopter or another type of aircraft to land.
The above photo is nothing. See where this place is in the clip with the stark-contrast.
Small structures are on the ‘roofs,’ especially this particular one. The little ‘buildings’ or ‘sheds’ are always aligned, length and width, with the rest of the rectilinear roofs.
Just as “MARS Anomalies” described, it seems as if one could go down and down to lower “levels” which get darker and darker with less and less sunlight. He also mentions the round, little things on his “platforms” and my “roofs.” What are they? They are also aligned, perfectly placed, not on any edge but right where these nodules or whatever should be placed…
…If they were on roof-type structures. And our eyes tell us there are many levels underneath. Nature does not produce perfectly straight lines. This is not natural pyrite.
Pluto and its intricate system of satellites are fantastic. What our eyes appear to behold in the clip could be exactly what is really there: the top levels of deep superstructures. And I thought architecture on Iapetus was incredible. Compare the ‘bleached’ rectangular shapes that are hardly seen in the light and darker version with the dramatic, high-contrast and very dark images in the clip. They match perfectly. Every differently-sized rectangle seen in the masked version is precisely matched by the dark, detailed version of the heart-shaped area of Pluto named ‘Sputnik Planum.’ “Platforms” or tops of superstructures appear to exist well concealed beneath a huge fake façade that are the NASA images of Pluto.
Did those who funded ‘New Horizons’ mission to Pluto already know of a civilization there and that was why the probe was launched in the first place? They’re going to Asteroid Bennu later this year because of a huge pyramid there and will probably take a good look at the unusual anomalies on Ceres also. The general public won’t see the good stuff. They will receive only bits and a lot of fakery.
How long has puppet NASA or the real directors of World Affairs known about Pluto? Ever since they decided to run a smear campaign against it being a planet? They know and we don’t? Don’t buy into lies. We are far from alone; life is everywhere. THEY have all the out-of-this-world reasons to lie to you. The ANTI-PLUTO campaign that demoted the 9th orbiter down to the level of a dwarf…had to have been motivated and carried out by the same shadow elite that have gone to such great lengths to hide what is really on the surface of Pluto.
IF YOU ENJOY THIS SITE PLEASE TELL OTHERS ABOUT US…SHARING IS CARING
Thanks to Tray and: http://bendedreality.com