"Martha and Convenient Lies About Bashers" - Guest Post by Rex
3/18/2016 11:16:00 AM Emailed, Thoughts
Emailed to Dinar Chronicles:
News Flash(?): Today (but not by any means for the first time), "Martha" explains how she (and presumably others on the same "team") intentionally withheld "intel" from her followers. "She" stated, "We opted not to bring all the great intel to the room because there are those who still feel it is necessary to constantly bash the providers." "The room", presumably, refers to the online "chat room" they run. In clear words, "Martha" chose to withhold "great intel" in order to punish those who might "bash" her.
Let's parse this out a bit so we know what to expect in the future. Bashing is defined as "severe criticism". Is "Martha" subject to severe criticism? I have seen some inappropriate and even vulgar language used in dinarland - although, it's filtered pretty well on most of the blog sites. In my observation, it seems to attach to failed predictions, and to a lesser extent, the whole idea of a massive revaluation of Iraqi currency.
However, though I cannot condone profane or vulgar diatribes against anyone, I endorse and participate when dinar gurus (yes, "Martha" is one) say things which are simply wrong and for which the gurus refuse to own. "Martha" is confusing earned criticism for bashing. To call anyone to account for their confidently announced errors and ask for explanation is a moral imperative for those who seek truth. I seek the truth.
I'll go further, I hate lies. Yes, I said "hate". Lies are the tool of deception and no moral distortion will support such behavior. When I hear or read lies, I become more acutely tuned in and aware what such a person said or announces in the future. Such person deserves greater scrutiny.
"Martha" and her crew deserve such scrutiny. Two weeks ago on their "just the facts" call (a hallucinatory misapplication of words), "Martha" was laughing frequently throughout the call seemingly as a gleeful response to the countlessly repeated phrase during that call, "we're going into the bank tomorrow". http://events.instantteleseminar.com/?eventid=81581880
This giddy and repeated announcement with absolute certainty was a sham. That followingFriday came and went, as did the next Friday, and here we are at the doors of the next Fridayafter that. Yet despite the unrelenting crescendo still being played, and "Martha" scolding us for "bashing", the continued assurances of "tomorrow" are repeated again and again without shame or seeming self-awareness. Note that I only speak of 3 weeks, but we all know these "announcements" stretch much, much farther back than that.
"Martha" would have you believe that the above is bashing. But, let me help: When "Martha" or anyone repeatedly relies on "sources" which provide 100% inaccurate information over the the course of months or years, it is no longer the failing of the supposed "sources" but of the one delivering the supposed "intel". "Martha" and Co. are the ones responsible for disseminating the deception.
If you disagree, please contradict me WITH FACTS. I invite facts to contradict that each and every single proclamation of "Martha" and her crew has been wrong - provably inaccurate on publicly known information. But please, if you disagree, give facts. Nonsense about "negative" remarks are an irrational diversion from the truth that "Martha" cannot stand against truth of her failed announcements. There is little more "negative" than the incessant repetition of emotionally presented falsehoods from unknowable sources. The "sources" are secret, not because they need to be protected for safety sake. These fountains of bologna from which "Martha" relays the sputum passed off as legitimate information (assuming all of the "intel" isn't just a whole cloth fabrication originating from "Martha" and crew) long ago proved themselves to be worthless to us all.
Truth may be difficult to present, and doing so may require a price by the teller, but it withstands criticism. The absurdities offered so confidently by "Martha" and crew haven't withstood even the most superficial analysis and critical thinking. "She" says it (whatever this week's nutty flavor of "it" may be) and it fails to find its way into reality - over and over and over and over again. Fooled us once, shame on us for believing. Fooled us 20 times, shame on us for even giving her an audience.
"Martha", I call you out for your absurd and deceptive announcements about 800 numbers, revaluation having already begun, ongoing exchanges at the hoped for rate, bank exchange centers existing, and a number of other notable falsehoods. And, you don't stand alone. Your compatriots know who they are. Shame on you and all like you. May you and your like prosper according to the grief visited upon the many people you've drawn into your deceptions.
As you continue to repeat your lies and deception, I will be the clarion call to expose you.
Rex
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Thanks to: http://inteldinarchronicles.blogspot.ca