Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
The Dynamic Steady State Universe
The New Cosmology
YES! IT IS TRUE! | |||
How do we know that the DSSU is the Real Universe? | |||
|
| “We have now completed our review of your manuscript, and I regret to tell you that we are not able to undertake further consideration of your submission for publication in The Astrophysical Journal. The standard model of cosmology is based on General Relativity, a theory which is internally self-consistent and has passed all available experimental tests. Naturally, it could still be wrong. However, we are not interested in exploring alternative theories …” –Ethan T. Vishniac, Editor-in-Chief, The Astrophysical Journal (dated May 13, 2015) |
What!? What about the obvious evidence presented with quality images? What’s going on here?
The problems are so serious that Lee Smolin, a physicist at the Perimeter Institute in Canada, has written a book in which he makes it clear “The problems are rooted in the way the career and funding structures of the academy reward me-too science, lack of courage, entrenchment of failed research programs, legacy building, empire building, narrowness, defensive strategies and groupthink.”
Meanwhile, this website remains steadfastly dedicated to presenting
truth in cosmology.
truth in cosmology.
(In compliance with copyright restrictions, free download of this article will not be made available until middle of 2016.)
–CR
–CR
* * * *
Cell Formation Simulation:
Interesting video of a simulated cellular universe:
The Millennium Simulation
NOTE: In the video, the Z-index (a redshift number) is being interpreted as a “time” parameter of an evolving universe in conformity with the big-bang expanding-universe paradigm. However, in reality (the DSSU cellular-universe reality), the Z-index is essentially a cosmic-distance parameter. The objective reality is that the Universe does NOT expand (only regional space expands). The Universe does NOT evolve (only subsystems evolve). The Universe simply IS. As Heraclitus, some 2500 years ago, wisely taught, This Universe always has been, is now, and always will be … (Fragment #29)
As for the cell structure that manifests as The Cosmic Web: In the DSSU, the cosmic cell structure is NOT phenomenological. It is NOT a phenomenon of the evolution of the universe; rather, the cell structure is fundamental and intrinsic.
–the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology
Conrad Ranzan (2008)
“We have to return to this foundation and start over again asking ancient but fundamental questions hoping that today we are in a better position to answer them.”
“We have to return to this foundation and start over again asking ancient but fundamental questions hoping that today we are in a better position to answer them.”
–Dr. Johan Masreliez
“Beneath the apparently haphazard motions ... may lie a formative tendency toward simplicity of form, order and regularity.”
–Lancelot Law Whyte
In this essay we explore cogent arguments in favor of an intrinsically cellular Universe —why it is not mere accident that the Universe is structured this way. Finding that the case for cellularity is overwhelmingly convincing we are led to ponder why the astrophysicists and cosmologists of the 20th century failed to adopt the concept as a key feature of the Universe. Think about it: Intrinsic cellularity implies some sort of regularity, some sort of orderly arrangement; but if the opposite, chaos and randomness, is the guiding principle of one's cosmology then grand-scale order makes little sense. If the Big Bang is part of one's belief system, then entertaining the idea of systematic cosmic patterns is strictly heretical. The experts of the 20th century blundered —badly. They knew the World was a cosmos of dynamic space; they knew that, since "space" is not nothingness, it has to be "filled" with a dynamic space medium; they knew these things on the acknowledged authority of Albert Einstein. In fact, these essentials were known as early as 1839 when when the French polymath Augustin Cauchy (1789-1857) proposed the very first dynamic space medium, an aether-like medium that had the ability to contract. And whatever has the ability to contract surely has the countering ability to expand (this was later confirmed by Einstein's theory of gravity). In any case, the experts were faced with a basic choice: There were FIVE ways the space medium of the Universe could be dynamic. They extensively investigated four categories of "dynamics." In the end, they settled on one —the consensus was that there is a universal expansion of the space medium. And so, with the some extraordinary extrapolation the 20th century became the age of EXPANDING universe models. ... However, in making the choice, they missed the FIFTH way! Yes they did. Unbelievable as it may sound, they failed to see what they could easily have seen. In fact, they failed to see what they should have seen because it is well within the domain of the foundation principle of all modern cosmology! Now why does all this matter? Well, it turns out that the expanding-universe models don't work. The steady-state expanding models don't work; and explosive expanding models (think Big Bang) don't work. All are problem plagued constructs. It matters because the real Universe is cellular —it is innately, stably, provably, cellular. It matters because the consequences are revolutionary. LINK to the complete essay: The Case for a Cellular Universe –the Story of a Baffling Omission in Modern Cosmology  There are five possible combinations of vacuum expansion and contraction. Each combination defines a category of universe models. ... Only one leads to a consistently problem-free cosmology. |
From Cellular Universe @ http://www.cellularuniverse.org/index.htm#PressRelease
For more information see [url=http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/steady state$20universe]http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/steady%20state$20universe[/url]
and [url=http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/no big$20bang]http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/no%20big$20bang[/url]
Thanks to: http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
and [url=http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/no big$20bang]http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/no%20big$20bang[/url]
Thanks to: http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com
