Anna von Reitz – The Alaska State Superior Court: The Authority
Posted on May 27, 2016 by arnierosnerOn May 27, 2016, at 7:11 PM, Anna von Reitz
*** PUBLIC NOTICE *** Attention Judicial Impostors: Immediate Order to Cease and Desist | Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!
In the international jurisdiction under Article X, therefore, I act as a Judge and operate under international law in behalf of the nation-state of Alaska. As most of the misunderstandings and conflicts we currently face are in this foreign jurisdiction this is where I spend the majority of time and this is most often the office I occupy. And that is why you see orders by me signed as a “Judge”.
Judge in International Capacity, Justice at Home — Unanswered Letters 18 — for Patriot Jenn
The Alaska State Superior Court is the “undelegated” side of the Alaska State Court, which the people are owed under The Alaska Statehood Compact—-otherwise, the Compact would be both illegal and unlawful. The two sides of the court can be invoked separately and in fact have to be invoked separately.
To better understand this remember that the actual Constitution delegated only nineteen strictly enumerated functions to the “Federal Government”—all in the international jurisdiction of the sea. Article X reserved all other undelegated rights, duties, functions and prerogatives in all jurisdictions including the jurisdiction of the sea, either to the states (meaning the states on the land) or the people of the land.
Thus the states on the land and the people retain the exercise of all undelegated powers owed to them in international jurisdiction as well as plenary control of their national (land) jurisdiction. The actual state court acting under the Organic and Public Law is charged to fill serve that “undelegated” international jurisdiction as well as the actual state (national) jurisdiction requirements.
Thus I have duties as a Judge in international jurisdiction and duties as a Justice of the Peace as you have described.
In the international jurisdiction it is my duty (and sometimes pleasure) to stomp on trespasses and usurpations against the sovereignty of the actual states and people made by foreign governments, including the foreign Federal United States Government and its franchises. In the national (state) jurisdiction it is my honor to serve as a Justice of the Peace for those who wish to live under the American Common Law as American State Nationals.
In the international jurisdiction under Article X, therefore, I act as a Judge and operate under international law in behalf of the nation-state of Alaska. As most of the misunderstandings and conflicts we currently face are in this foreign jurisdiction this is where I spend the majority of time and this is most often the office I occupy. And that is why you see orders by me signed as a “Judge”.
I very much hope that in days to come you will see me listening to the vows of happy young people planning a life and family together and recording their marriage on the public records of the land of their birth. You may be sure that I would be signing those records as a Justice of the Peace.
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Paul Stramer at Eurekadsl.net
[ltr]<
pstramer@eurekadsl.net
>[/ltr]
wrote:
I have forwarded your question to Anna.
Paul
—– Original Message —–
From: Patriot Jenn
To: Paul Stramer
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: Hague Notice of Fraud, Order to Cease and Desist
Dearest Paul,
I have all respect for judge Anna but I was wondering. Shouldn’t she call herself a lower case s Supreme Court “justice?”
Just wondering.
In most parts of the world, a judge is an appointed official of the court who also happens to hold a degree in law. Judges tend to be associated with legal functions that have to do with the enforcement of the laws of the land. As such, a judge will preside at a legal proceeding, such as a criminal hearing or a civil court case. He or she will render a verdict based on the legal procedures and precedents currently in force in the jurisdiction, including the deliverance of sentences for prison terms if the situation merits this course of action.
In contrast, justices will perform a different function within the judicial system. Also sworn to uphold the laws of the land, this person does not necessarily have to be an attorney or have any formal legal training. Instead, he or she will be empowered by the jurisdiction to perform such functions as the witnessing of legal documents, the performance of civil unions and marriages, and other similar duties as defined by the jurisdiction. In some parts of the world, local justice officials are elected rather than appointed.
Thanks to: https://scannedretina.com