2016 1027 Dave Schmidt Rant About OOM2 Site and threatens to "TAKE OUT", "TAKE DOWN", "BLACKBALL" & "BLACKLIST" the Owner

bs4ever wrote:

microaggressor wrote: Everyone else is in lock step with you. I however like to hear the truth.

Hello Micro

Welcome to this forum.

A bit of an entrance you have in the above posts there and somewhat demanding in an offended manner it appears.

Whatever has caused you to be angered enough to imply the truth is not being said is not really relevant is it?

Unless of course you don't realise that every word of this thread is now most likely being recorded by Mr Schmidt for use in his own defense should matters be allowed to go that far.

That it has been published in a public arena what was said and archived by Mr Schmidt with a reference to the dedicated pages containing the same is enough to answer your questions.

We would all appreciate emotion can take away the civility for a moment and that may be why you choose the wording you did at the time, however, it must occur to you that if it appears to you "everyone is in lock step" there must be a reason for the impression you have.

Please do hang around and find out just why this thread exists from a while back. 

There are a decent bunch of people here, get to know them?

If you are in fact a follower of Mr Schmidt and already have an opinion formed in his favour then it is unlikely you will change your mind

I hope you find his path fruitful

 

"Whatever has caused you to be angered enough to imply the truth is not being said is not really relevant is it?" I really don't understand what you mean. I implied nothing, I stated a fact. The title of the post does not correspond to what is in the video. Why would Purple post a video any reasonable person would assume was the evidence for Dave Taking you out, instead of the actual video where he say's this? I've asked over and over and all I get is the run around. 

    "That it has been published in a public arena what was said and archived by Mr Schmidt with a reference to the dedicated pages containing the same is enough to answer your questions." So if it is "archived", then why won't purple give me a link? Purple made the accusation. Instead I'm told to go to his forum which does not exist.

 "everyone is in lock step" there must be a reason for the impression you have.
NOT ONE person said that  the video did not say that he did not say what purple claims. If that isn't a perfect example of lock step, then I don't know what is.

  "If you are in fact a follower of Mr Schmidt and already have an opinion formed in his favour then it is unlikely you will change your mind" Change my mind to what? I have not been given anything that would change it now have I?

PurpleSkyz wrote:micro...

That is correct. I provided you with the link to the video section I have here on Dave Schmidt. I don't troll Dave's site. I do know that if you go to You Tube and go to archive you can get all of the videos he has put out. You say "take you down" is what the above says. Yes Dave said that also. But is that in itself not enough of a threat in your opinion? If someone said they were gonna TAKE YOU DOWN you would not think that is enough of a threat? smh

Here is a link to an example of where Dave has removed the first TAKE YOU OUT that I shared a transcription from that you can plainly see it has been removed: http://www.oom2.com/t41583-dave-schmidt-oct-5th-why-are-we-receiving-these-funds
We have this archived though so we still have it.

Also I was on a conference call and am expecting another here in a few minutes and don't have the time right now to go thru them all.

Here is a link to the live stream minus the chipmunk voice and the one above that my friends have created: http://www.oom2.com/t42073-dave-schmidt-live-stream-oct-12th
This has the time mark that I noted for your convenience.

"You say "take you down is what the above says. Yes Dave said that also. But is that in itself not enough of a threat in your opinion? If someone said they were gonna TAKE YOU DOWN you would not think that is enough of a threat?" smh Yes,it's a threat, but not a threat of physical harm. Why did you change the wording to "take you out" if you think " "But is that in itself not enough of a threat in your opinion?" Seems to me that if you thought that was enough of a threat, you wouldn't need to change the wording.

  "Here is a link to an example of where Dave has removed the first TAKE YOU OUT that I shared a transcription from that you can plainly see it has been removed: http://www.oom2.com/t41583-dave-"  There is  a video at the bottom of the page that has been removed, that has a date of Oct. 5th. There is also one that is at the top og the page that say's Oct. 5th. I'm not going to watch it because I've already watched others that you claim that he say's "Take you out." and was a complete waste of time. 

  "Here is a link to the live stream minus the chipmunk voice and the one above that my friends have created: http://www.oom2.com/t42073-dave-schmidt-live-stream-oct-12th 

 This is the same video as all the others. I watched 9 minutes of it from your 18 minute time stamp and he said the same thing as the others of course. Another big waste of time.



  

PurpleSkyz wrote:He said TAKE YOU OUT on 2 occasions. So you can believe this or not. Like I said I don't care either way. I  wonder if he went back and changed this on his videos? Probably. Either way it matters not as we have the originals saved and you are correct... this is a waste of my time and yours so thank you in pointing out that he made changes to the videos. That info is helpful to us. Thanks :)
your Man, aren't something!! I call you on your your obvious misrepresentation of what Dave actually says and you say "I  wonder if he went back and changed this on his videos? Probably." Yes, if you watch the video, you can clearly see the blip where he dubs in the word "down" for the word "out". If you have an archived video which you claim has him saying :"Take you out" then how come you keep sending me to videos that clearly say "Take you down"? And why do you put up a video in your original post that says "Take you down" instead of your "archived video"? Why would anyone do that? Answer that for me.

PurpleSkyz wrote:micro.... in case you have some kind comprehension issues I will try to be clearer for you:

* I POSTED THE LINK WITH THE TIME STATED THAT YOU ASKED ABOUT.
* I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING MORE CLEAR IN SAYING THE FORUM ON THIS SITE WHICH I THEN CLARIFIED. I SHALL AGAIN SO YOU GET IT: NOT DAVE'S SITE THIS ONE.
* I HAVE MADE NO ACCUSATIONS. I HAVE STATED FACTS WHICH YOU CAN VERIFY FOR YOURSELF BY WATCHING THE LINK PROVIDED TO YOU.

 "micro.... in case you have some kind comprehension issues I will try to be clearer for you:"

  "That video is in his forum so check it out."
 You said "his" forum. Now how does one make that mistake? Aren't we being condescending. I have no comprehension issues, I'm just going by what you said. It's amazing how you can say I'm having issues and blame me for your mistake.  

PurpleSkyz wrote:I sure do and thank you for saying so. Appreciate your input and you are spot on. :)

microaggressor wrote:

PurpleSkyz wrote:micro.... in case you have some kind comprehension issues I will try to be clearer for you:

* I POSTED THE LINK WITH THE TIME STATED THAT YOU ASKED ABOUT.
* I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT BEING MORE CLEAR IN SAYING THE FORUM ON THIS SITE WHICH I THEN CLARIFIED. I SHALL AGAIN SO YOU GET IT: NOT DAVE'S SITE THIS ONE.
* I HAVE MADE NO ACCUSATIONS. I HAVE STATED FACTS WHICH YOU CAN VERIFY FOR YOURSELF BY WATCHING THE LINK PROVIDED TO YOU.

 "micro.... in case you have some kind comprehension issues I will try to be clearer for you:"

  "That video is in his forum so check it out."
 You said "his" forum. Now how does one make that mistake? Aren't we being condescending. I have no comprehension issues, I'm just going by what you said. It's amazing how you can say I'm having issues and blame me for your mistake.  

PurpleSkyz wrote: 
I was not incorrect on take you out. But maybe that was some weird Mandela  not TAKE YOU OUT on the above video. My bad.

 Hey I like that!! Next time I'm caught in a deception, and every single spin I offer up is dismantled, and pulled apart, I'll just go with the trusty old Mandela effect. Brilliant!

 This little known strategy could actually turn around Hillary's low approval rating. Hillary and her (Not "his" I wanted to be clear on that) surrogates could answer every email question with "that was some weird Mandela" (effect) I hope none of her supporters come across this conversation, it could have an effect on the outcome of the election! 
 

PurpleSkyz wrote:I want to add...

Look Dave lost his shit when I inquired about his embezzlement issues. He said things I am sure he regrets or soon will. He first said he did not have to pay a fine of 10K then said he did. He does not want the focus put on his past. I get this. I even apologized to him for pissing him off. I thought the guy was gonna stroke out when he turned so red and I wanted to diffuse the situation. And I did. I then did not ask him any other questions but took notes on what he was saying.

The reason I was even on his live stream chat was because he is a total fraud. If you listen to the entire call he plainly says he can at any time decide to not do business with you and keep your currency. He says you will not get the currency back only the cash value that you paid for it. This is just one of the many red flags those that plan on sending this known criminal their currency should be considering. There is so much more that I could say but... I will not. I have my reasons and have been advised to say as little as possible about Dave and his tantrum.

You do not have to believe a single word of any of this. I really don't care either way. I did not go on any other site and spread this to discredit Dave. Other than Dinar Daily and my fakebook page because that is where I post. I could be sending this to every single dinar site and I have not. You came here. I did not invite you. I do not know who you are other than where you are located from your IP address. Bottom line is I owe you nothing. Do your own research.

My purpose here is to expose the fraudsters that prey on the trusting souls that include the elderly and many others that do not know how to research on their own and this is all.