Final Reply to Larry Becraft By Anna Von Reitz plus more

Final Reply to Larry Becraft

By Anna Von Reitz


I understand that Larry Becraft has been calling me a "Fake" Judge again, and his pal, Bob Hurt, too. 

Here is my Final Reply:

If I am a "fake" Judge, Larry, your butt is on the line for not prosecuting me. 

Put up or shut up, Larry. 

Otherwise, continuing to slander and defame me and accuse me of committing a crime without pursuing prosecution will be ample grounds to charge you both civilly and criminally.  And since you are claiming to be a Territorial United States Citizen, you have no recourse to say you are merely expressing your "opinion" and exercising your First Amendment rights---- because you have none. 

This game can be played from both sides.

Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net

There's Pikers, and Then.... There's Bob Hurt

By Anna Von Reitz

Imagine this situation: 


You have spent decades of your life studying public documents that are available to everyone to read.  You look around and realize that nobody knows what those documents actually say -- so you bring forward the facts to help educate people who are suffering and "being destroyed" as Amos says, for lack of knowledge. 


And certain people start calling you a "liar" and a "fake" and God-only-knows-what-else, even though they haven't bothered to read it all themselves. They just "know" what they think they know. And then they demand that you "prove it" to them because they are too lazy to read the documents and prove it to themselves. 


Let's recap --- they haven't read the documents. You have. They won't believe  you when you tell them what the documents say.  Then they still refuse to read the documents for themselves and demand that you "prove" to them what the documents say....


Hello?  


That reminds me of the time my Best Friend Forever said she'd offer me five bucks to go pee for her because she was afraid to walk out to the latrine at summer camp in the middle of the night. 


There are some things that other people can't do "for" you.  Proving what a document that you refuse to read for yourself says --- is one of those.  


I wish there were some way that I could attach a USB cable from my ear to your ears and just download everything I know.  The world would quickly become a much safer and saner and more law-abiding place.  


Everyone would know how the governments are supposed to be structured and how they are supposed to be funded and would know where the problems lie --- and so, would correct the Mess without any big debate.  


But until people stop reacting like little babies and going "Waah!  Wahh!  That can't be so!  You must be lying to me!  Waah!  Wahh!  Prove it to me!  Waaaah!" -- and start reading and thinking as adults who are responsible for reading and researching and knowing the facts for themselves -- there is no USB cable.


You have to either believe me and take my word for what it says, or you have to read it yourself and determine what it says.  Those are the two options that Nature gave us.  All those that want "proof" need to man up and prove it to themselves, especially as I and others have already done the heavy lifting and told everyone where to look. 


----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Posted by Paul Stramer at 5:36 PM

Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net

You See, Bob......

By Anna Von Reitz

You see, Bob, to adopt your own chauvinistic and condescending tone --- you make the mistake of thinking that you know what you don't know, and interpreting legal documents without knowing the legal meaning of words and terms.  


I know this is so the same way that judges always know when someone is ignorant of legal jargon and comes to their courtroom all stuffed up on what they THINK they know --- and don't.  Those are the same people who are surprised to learn that they have no "constitutional rights" while claiming to be US Citizens or "citizens of the United States". 


You make all the mistakes that patriots typically make and all the same (wrong) assumptions, too.  And the really cloying part of this, is that you look down your nose at the patriots while encouraging and displaying the same kind of ignorance yourself.   I find that very suspicious, Bob.  Is it deliberate? 


I have already proven to anyone's satisfaction that you know nothing about what "citizenship" is or what kinds of "citizenship" there are.  


I have already demonstrated that although you claim to be a "US citizen" of some kind, you don't have the least little bit of an idea what that political status obligates you to be and to do.  You don't know and can't tell me, but you are a big enough Blowhard to try to bluff it out and pretend that you know "stuff" and I don't. 


So let's put it to test, Bob.  I already gave you a long list of words that you should know the legal meanings of, presented in pairs: 


"Citizen" and "National"
"Law Enforcement" and "Peacekeeping" 
"Domestic" and "Non-domestic" 
"Resident" and "Landlord" 
"Usufruct" and "Holder in Due Course". 
"Alien" and "Inhabitant"
"Within" and "Without" 
"Including" and "Excepting"
"Judge" and "Justice" 
"Postmaster" and "Post Master"
"of" and "for" 
"United States" and "United States of America"
"Territorial" and "National"
"Declaration" and "Constitution"
"Title" and "Covenant" 
"Patent" and "Deed"
"Warrant" and "Writ"


So let's see you demonstrate even a passing knowledge of what the legal definitions of these words are for starters, before you pretend to have knowledge that you: (a) don't have or (b) have, but choose not to reveal to others. 


Somehow you think that you can just "shine me on" and make me kow-tow to your ignorance and name-calling and condescending language. 


You might as well give up with that train of thought right now.  I've faced off the Pope..  I am not going to bow to you. 


----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Posted by Paul Stramer at 9:24 PM

Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net

My Comment on the T-ROH Warrant

By Anna Von Reitz

Okay, first of all, let’s make sure that everyone knows what a warrant and a court are. Then we will look at T-ROH’s jurisdiction or lack thereof with respect to me and others named by these madmen.
warrant. 1) n. an order (writ) of a court which directs a law enforcement officer (usually a sheriff) to arrest and bring a person before the judge, such as a person who is charged with a crime, convicted of a crime but failed to appear for sentencing, owes a fine or is in contempt of court.
Legal Definition of “court”:
Court: n. A court is a tribunal, often as a government institution, with the authority to adjudicate legal disputes between parties and carry out the administration of justice in civil, criminal, and administrative matters in accordance with the rule of law. ... The place where a court sits is known as a venue.
Lawful Definition of “court”:
Court: n. any tribunal within a judicial system. Under English common law and in some states it was a court which heard only lawsuits in which damages were sought, as distinguished from a court of equity which could grant special remedies.
Quote my friend, Mark Emery, Founder of The Lighthouse Law Club:
Learn about 'lawful' courts and how to hold your own court. Court is not a 'place' it's an assembly of qualified jurors convened in any location by the plaintiff and the defendant under the security of the Sheriff.  https://vimeo.com/248990751
In fact and in truth, a court is the assemblage of people creating the court. It is not a building or place (that’s merely the venue). And as you can see above, a court may be engaged in settling “legal” disputes or “lawful” disputes.
As a result, a warrant may be a “writ” issued by a lawful court, or it may be an “order” issued by a legal court.
And in any case, in order for a warrant to have any validity, the “person” – either the Natural Person addressed by a lawful court, or the legal fiction PERSON addressed by a legal court---has to be in the jurisdiction of that court.
As I do not subscribe to T-ROH and am not a citizen of T-ROH and long ago severed any association with T-ROH whatsoever (I checked out their spiel along with RuSA and all the other wannabe organizations and found them wanting for the reasons already discussed.) nothing that they say or do has any jurisdiction related to me.
In fact, their “warrant” has as much authority as a similar “warrant” issued by the Ladies’ Sewing Circle and Terrorist Society of Columbus, Ohio. The Campus Police at Georgia State have more actual authority than T-ROH.
So am I worried? Of course, I am worried. These people are nutcases, dangerously unbalanced and irrational and out ramming around South America, presumably acting as a nutcase magnet for similarly inclined persons. That is something to worry about for sure and has been reported to Homeland Security.
All that said --- 
This recent fashion for private organizations issuing “Warrants” for “Arrest” of other people was started by Kevin Annett and his International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and State, which as usual, Copycat Livingway has adopted as something he thinks he can do, too.
If anyone acts on such “Warrants” and kidnaps people who belong to other countries and other jurisdictions of the law, they are likely to: (a) be fired upon and (b) be prosecuted as criminals. 


We have extradition treaties with some other countries that allow for prisoner exchanges and settlement of criminal charges in foreign jurisdictions, but not with T-ROH, which with any luck will simply fade away as another ill-conceived foreign organization built on sand.


----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Posted by Paul Stramer at 5:39 PM

Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net

Shills, Shillings, and the King's Shillings

By Anna Von Reitz

Ever wonder where the slang use of the word "Shill" came from, as in, "He's a shill." --meaning that someone was acting in a dishonest capacity? 


A couple hundred years ago, disguised King's Officers haunted the pubs of England, Ireland and Scotland. They would offer to buy rounds as people still sometimes do, only they would slip coins -- British Shillings -- into the bottom of the tankards. And when the victims got to the bottom of the glass they would find "the King's Shilling".



Immediately, they would be clapped in irons by waiting Marines and press-ganged into the King's Navy using this excuse.



Well, obviously, this is insane, dishonest, and pseudo-legal chicanery. The acceptance of what was advertised as free beer does not logically add up to a pledge to serve without pay in the King's Navy for a period of years. Nonetheless, this is what this horrendous government did to its own people.



And despite worldwide sanctions against slavery and involuntary servitude and the outlawing of press-ganging, they are still doing it and they aren't even content with preying upon their own people. Oh, no, they had to export it worldwide. 


In America, they have conscripted our doctors using a false licensing process and forced them to act as "shills" -- just like the purveyors of "free beer". They are forced to register "berths" in the King's Merchant Marine Service and "Social Security Accounts" for each new American baby born -- giving rise to the thoroughly false legal presumption that they are "volunteering" to be and act in the capacity of British Subjects.



The same sneaky, dishonest, fraudulent claims have been made against Aussies and Canadians, Germans and Japanese -- people all around the world have suffered from the criminality. You've been press-ganged, and nothing substantive has changed except that they don't offer as much as a shilling in return.



Please address your comments to:

British Embassy
3100 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20008



Secretary General
United Nations Headquarters
New York, NY 10017



and, last, but not least ---
https://www.interpol.int/Contact-INTERPOL



The above link is the Interpol address to report crime, especially international crime.



What we wish to report is essentially Human Trafficking on paper, designed to create an opportunity for unlawful conversion of assets and falsification of public records so as to deprive people of their natural political status and national affiliations-- which is a war crime under both the Hague and Geneva Conventions, and results in involuntary public servitude under color of law and process of undisclosed adhesion contracts.



This has been going on for 150 years right under their noses. So we would all like an explanation of this circumstance and some accountability for the deplorable incompetence that the politicians, police, military, and members of the Bar Associations have displayed. 


And if they start making any "shifty" noises, smile and inform them that you are discharging your duty to report and combat crime by bringing it to the attention of the proper authorities.



Thank you, very much, etc., etc., etc....


----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com


To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Posted by Paul Stramer at 11:25 AM

Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net