Saturday, October 6, 2012
Was Hillary Clinton Involved in Benghazi Attack to Provoke More Bloodshed?
Susanne Posel
Activist Post
US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, is trying to buy time
after having been questioned about the planned attack and coordinated
US-sponsored al-Qaeda use to facilitate the murder of the late US
Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.
Except, there was no US Embassy in Benghazi. There was a “diplomatic office” or CIA-compound which was burned to the ground. The nearest US Embassy to the area is in Tripoli.
Stevens, hardly being a US Ambassador, but rather a gunrunner
for the behind the scenes terroristic attacks by the Saudi Arabian
nation on the Islamic world. Saudi Arabia adheres to Salafism, an
extremist form of Islam that want all other forms of the religion wiped
off the map. Stevens was ultimately killed by the same group he had
provided guns and other armory for when they were employed by the US to
commit the false flag attack on the CIA-compound in Benghazi.
The Government Accountability Office has threatened in a recent report to evaluate Clinton’s role in the attack. Diplomatic Security,
which is the responsibility of the US State Department, is compromised
if Clinton will allow coerced attacks using US-operatives masquerading
as Islamic terrorists for the purpose of committing a flase flag to
instigate war with Middle Eastern nations.
Clinton, trying to appear to be concerned about the event, vowed
publicly to “find those responsible for the attack.” She said: “There
are continuing questions about what exactly happened in Benghazi on that
night three weeks ago. We will not rest until we answer those questions
and until we track down the terrorists who killed our people.”
However, Clinton had connections to the orchestrated bombing that
occurred on the anniversary of September 11th terrorist attacks where
al-Qaeda was used as a scapegoat for the deaths of thousands of American
citizens in one of the biggest state-sponsored false flags in US
history.
Coinciding with Stevens’ death multiple waves of manufactured Muslim uprisings seemed to validate the terrorist attack. A US-funded film was created
with the assistance of an FBI-informant who just happened to be an
Israeli citizen. Over 100 Jewish donors gave money to have this “wag the
dog” trailer produced so that the Islamic riots would have a purpose.
Creating
spin to further convolute the issue, Clinton remarked: “We have a lot
of work to do to give complete and accurate responses to all the
questions and statements that are swirling out there. Let’s establish
all the facts before we jump to any conclusions.”
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was deployed to Tripoli, where
the actual US Embassy is located. The crime scene in Benghazi was left
to be destroyed by CIA-operatives dressed up as rioters to contaminate the evidence.
The State Department claims that cryptic warnings of an impending attack
on Benghazi was relayed, yet devoid of a time frame and therefore
ignored. In response, Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee and Jason Chaffetz, House Representative of
Utah are demanding an investigation and that Clinton explain the actions of the State Department in the time up and until the coordinated attack.
According to the letter from
Issa to Clinton: “Based on information provided to the Committee by
individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that
claimed the ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks
on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to
September 11, 2012. It was clearly never, as Administration officials
once insisted, the result of a popular protest,” the committee’s
chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and subcommittee chairman, Rep.
Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, write. “In addition, multiple U.S. federal
government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the
September 11 attack, the U.S. mission in Libya made repeated requests
for increased security in Benghazi. The mission in Libya, however, was
denied these resources by officials in Washington.”
Stevens, having no idea
that he was about to be sacrificed by the US government for the sake of
a false flag attack, was not concerned about utilizing security in the
days before the bombing. In fact, Clinton authorized the security to be lessened in Benghazi and the US Marines guarding the US Embassy in Tripoli to be disarmed.
Clinton wrote back
to Issa, saying: “I appreciate that you and your committee are deeply
interested in finding out what happened leading up to and during the
attacks in Benghazi, and are looking for ways to prevent it from
happening again. I share that commitment.” She asked Issa to allow that
any summations of the event at Benghazi be held off until November,
after the elections, or perhaps into 2013 because witnesses were being
questioned at the State Department’s Office of Legislative Affairs. This
must be a request to defer the issue until Clinton and their lackeys
can get their stories straight.
To keep the truth that the attack on Benghazi was a US-backed false flag, documents at the compound were destroyed just prior to the attack. This act mirrors the sudden shredding
of documents at the US Embassy in Beirut that destroyed classified
information. These documents showed the names of Libyans who were
working with the US as well as oil contracts and information regarding
the coordinated attack. Clinton was in contact
with the al-Qaeda operatives who attacked the compound in Benghazi and
murdered Stevens just 48 hours before the event was enacted.
Publicly, the US State Department denies this fact by refusing to
comment. The compound in Benghazi that was burned by al-Qaeda operatives
was looted to make sure all evidence was removed before the press,
residents of Libya or any official could gain access to the buildings.
The compound in Benghazi was a safe-house that Stevens would have fled
to during an emergency situation. Knowing this, Clinton combined fake
revolutionaries with CIA-operatives to create a situation that could be
spun to serve the purpose of the US and Israel in destroying the
sovereign nations in the Middle East.
Last month Clinton admitted
that al-Qaeda was used in the attack in Benghazi. Speaking to the UN
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Clinton stated that al-Qaeda was employed
to facilitate a manufactured threat of Islamic extremism in the region.
Clinton explains: “Now with a larger safe haven and increased freedom
to maneuver, terrorists are seeking to extend their reach and their
networks in multiple directions. And they are working with other violent
extremists to undermine the democratic transitions under way in North
Africa, as we tragically saw in Benghazi.”
In line with the US version of the story, Israeli “intelligence” reported that “This attack ,
along with the one in Egypt, is a reminder of the Iranian invasion of a
U.S. embassy in Tehran that led to a lengthy hostage crisis which
brought down the [President Jimmy] Carter administration.”
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism.
Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it
actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream
media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
Thanks to: http://www.activistpost.com
Was Hillary Clinton Involved in Benghazi Attack to Provoke More Bloodshed?
"We came, we saw, he died" Clinton's cold words when Gaddafi was killed and dragged through the streets. |
Activist Post
US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, is trying to buy time
after having been questioned about the planned attack and coordinated
US-sponsored al-Qaeda use to facilitate the murder of the late US
Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.
Except, there was no US Embassy in Benghazi. There was a “diplomatic office” or CIA-compound which was burned to the ground. The nearest US Embassy to the area is in Tripoli.
Stevens, hardly being a US Ambassador, but rather a gunrunner
for the behind the scenes terroristic attacks by the Saudi Arabian
nation on the Islamic world. Saudi Arabia adheres to Salafism, an
extremist form of Islam that want all other forms of the religion wiped
off the map. Stevens was ultimately killed by the same group he had
provided guns and other armory for when they were employed by the US to
commit the false flag attack on the CIA-compound in Benghazi.
The Government Accountability Office has threatened in a recent report to evaluate Clinton’s role in the attack. Diplomatic Security,
which is the responsibility of the US State Department, is compromised
if Clinton will allow coerced attacks using US-operatives masquerading
as Islamic terrorists for the purpose of committing a flase flag to
instigate war with Middle Eastern nations.
Clinton, trying to appear to be concerned about the event, vowed
publicly to “find those responsible for the attack.” She said: “There
are continuing questions about what exactly happened in Benghazi on that
night three weeks ago. We will not rest until we answer those questions
and until we track down the terrorists who killed our people.”
However, Clinton had connections to the orchestrated bombing that
occurred on the anniversary of September 11th terrorist attacks where
al-Qaeda was used as a scapegoat for the deaths of thousands of American
citizens in one of the biggest state-sponsored false flags in US
history.
Coinciding with Stevens’ death multiple waves of manufactured Muslim uprisings seemed to validate the terrorist attack. A US-funded film was created
with the assistance of an FBI-informant who just happened to be an
Israeli citizen. Over 100 Jewish donors gave money to have this “wag the
dog” trailer produced so that the Islamic riots would have a purpose.
Creating
spin to further convolute the issue, Clinton remarked: “We have a lot
of work to do to give complete and accurate responses to all the
questions and statements that are swirling out there. Let’s establish
all the facts before we jump to any conclusions.”
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was deployed to Tripoli, where
the actual US Embassy is located. The crime scene in Benghazi was left
to be destroyed by CIA-operatives dressed up as rioters to contaminate the evidence.
The State Department claims that cryptic warnings of an impending attack
on Benghazi was relayed, yet devoid of a time frame and therefore
ignored. In response, Darrell Issa, chairman of the House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee and Jason Chaffetz, House Representative of
Utah are demanding an investigation and that Clinton explain the actions of the State Department in the time up and until the coordinated attack.
According to the letter from
Issa to Clinton: “Based on information provided to the Committee by
individuals with direct knowledge of events in Libya, the attack that
claimed the ambassador’s life was the latest in a long line of attacks
on Western diplomats and officials in Libya in the months leading up to
September 11, 2012. It was clearly never, as Administration officials
once insisted, the result of a popular protest,” the committee’s
chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and subcommittee chairman, Rep.
Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, write. “In addition, multiple U.S. federal
government officials have confirmed to the Committee that, prior to the
September 11 attack, the U.S. mission in Libya made repeated requests
for increased security in Benghazi. The mission in Libya, however, was
denied these resources by officials in Washington.”
Stevens, having no idea
that he was about to be sacrificed by the US government for the sake of
a false flag attack, was not concerned about utilizing security in the
days before the bombing. In fact, Clinton authorized the security to be lessened in Benghazi and the US Marines guarding the US Embassy in Tripoli to be disarmed.
Clinton wrote back
to Issa, saying: “I appreciate that you and your committee are deeply
interested in finding out what happened leading up to and during the
attacks in Benghazi, and are looking for ways to prevent it from
happening again. I share that commitment.” She asked Issa to allow that
any summations of the event at Benghazi be held off until November,
after the elections, or perhaps into 2013 because witnesses were being
questioned at the State Department’s Office of Legislative Affairs. This
must be a request to defer the issue until Clinton and their lackeys
can get their stories straight.
To keep the truth that the attack on Benghazi was a US-backed false flag, documents at the compound were destroyed just prior to the attack. This act mirrors the sudden shredding
of documents at the US Embassy in Beirut that destroyed classified
information. These documents showed the names of Libyans who were
working with the US as well as oil contracts and information regarding
the coordinated attack. Clinton was in contact
with the al-Qaeda operatives who attacked the compound in Benghazi and
murdered Stevens just 48 hours before the event was enacted.
Publicly, the US State Department denies this fact by refusing to
comment. The compound in Benghazi that was burned by al-Qaeda operatives
was looted to make sure all evidence was removed before the press,
residents of Libya or any official could gain access to the buildings.
The compound in Benghazi was a safe-house that Stevens would have fled
to during an emergency situation. Knowing this, Clinton combined fake
revolutionaries with CIA-operatives to create a situation that could be
spun to serve the purpose of the US and Israel in destroying the
sovereign nations in the Middle East.
Last month Clinton admitted
that al-Qaeda was used in the attack in Benghazi. Speaking to the UN
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Clinton stated that al-Qaeda was employed
to facilitate a manufactured threat of Islamic extremism in the region.
Clinton explains: “Now with a larger safe haven and increased freedom
to maneuver, terrorists are seeking to extend their reach and their
networks in multiple directions. And they are working with other violent
extremists to undermine the democratic transitions under way in North
Africa, as we tragically saw in Benghazi.”
In line with the US version of the story, Israeli “intelligence” reported that “This attack ,
along with the one in Egypt, is a reminder of the Iranian invasion of a
U.S. embassy in Tehran that led to a lengthy hostage crisis which
brought down the [President Jimmy] Carter administration.”
Susanne Posel is the Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism.
Our alternative news site is dedicated to reporting the news as it
actually happens; not as it is spun by the corporately funded mainstream
media. You can find us on our Facebook page.
Thanks to: http://www.activistpost.com