Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Is it possible to apply positive + in favor Newton III Motion Law as a dynamic system in a motor engine
The Weiner Laptop EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Update - Robert Dunlop Arrested
The Weiner Laptop EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 12:14 am by RamblerNash

» As We Navigate Debs Passing
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Jan 08, 2024 6:18 pm by Ponee

» 10/7 — Much More Dangerous & Diabolical Than Anyone Knows
The Weiner Laptop EmptyThu Nov 02, 2023 8:30 pm by KennyL

» Sundays and Deb.....
The Weiner Laptop EmptySun Oct 01, 2023 9:11 pm by NanneeRose

» African Official Exposes Bill Gates’ Depopulation Agenda: ‘My Country Is Not Your Laboratory’
The Weiner Laptop EmptyThu Sep 21, 2023 4:39 am by NanneeRose

The Weiner Laptop EmptySun Sep 03, 2023 10:23 am by ANENRO

» Attorney Reveals the “Exculpatory” Evidence Jack Smith Possesses that Exonerates President Trump
The Weiner Laptop EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:48 am by ANENRO

» Update From Site Owner to Members & Guests
The Weiner Laptop EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:47 am by ANENRO

» New global internet censorship began today
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 21, 2023 9:25 am by NanneeRose

» Alienated from reality
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why does Russia now believe that Covid-19 was a US-created bioweapon?
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Man reports history of interaction with seemingly intelligent orbs
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Western reactions to the controversial Benin Bronzes
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» India unveils first images from Moon mission
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists achieve nuclear fusion net energy gain for second time
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Putin Signals 5G Ban
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “Texas Student Dies in Car Accident — Discovers Life after Death”
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The hidden history taught by secret societies
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Vaccines and SIDS (Crib Death)
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Sun blasts out highest-energy radiation ever recorded, raising questions for solar physics
The Weiner Laptop EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why you should be eating more porcini mushrooms
The Weiner Laptop EmptySun Aug 06, 2023 10:38 am by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

The Weiner Laptop

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

1The Weiner Laptop Empty The Weiner Laptop Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:47 am



The Weiner Laptop Hqdefault

The Weiner Laptop

According to the report of DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, Peter Strzok’s decision to prioritize the “Russia Investigation” over following-up on investigating Anthony Weiner’s computer was not free from bias.
However, Strzok’s bias or lack thereof is beside the point, as I will explain in a moment.
This video details how in late September 2016, Peter Strzok, then in charge of the FBI’s Clinton email investigation, actively avoided investigating Anthony Weiner’s laptop before the election. The computer had been seized by the FBI’s New York office in a separate investigation into Weiner’s sexting with a minor when 141,000+ emails between Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin were discovered in it.
The New York FBI’s search warrant did not cover those emails, requiring an additional warrant from the FBI’s DC office in order to investigate these but the warrant wasn’t issued until a month later on October 30, 2016 – or one week before the election. When asked the reason for the delay, FBI officials, Andrew McCabe, Bill Priestap, Peter Strzok and Lisa Page all gave excuses – all of which have been rejected by the Inspector General.
Not that Horowitz is so squeaky-clean, either. The IG’s focus on Strzok’s bias against Trump is just so much obfuscation, in light of the fact that it’s since been discovered that Strzok held a joint CIA/FBI position and answered primarily to former CIA director John Brennan – who clearly has it in for Trump. (One wonders who is pulling Brennan’s chain, with all of his carrying-on as a paid pundit on MSDNC)?
Thus, when Strzok testified that his bias didn’t “impact any official action [he] took,” he wasn’t perjuring himself. Strzok was simply following orders in a covert operation to cover up the crimes of Hillary Clinton and to frame and destroy Trump – an operation which continues to this day.
Further, members of the House Intelligence Committee who questioned Strzok were also careful not blow Strzok’s cover by framing their questions in terms of his “bias”, rather than by asking the questions that would have revealed his role in this very obvious (and treasonous) covert CIA operation.
How many of these people can get away with plausible deniability?


Thanks to: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum