Why it’s time to arrest the CEOs of Google and Facebook

Why it’s time to arrest the CEOs of Google and Facebook

Posted on 10/17/2018 by admin



Tech giants pull off epic “bait-and-switch” in turning against free speech
Wednesday, October 17, 2018 by: Mike Adams
(Natural News) The tech giants are pure evil. They ran a coordinated, deliberate campaign to claim they would protect free speech in order to attract hundreds of millions of users, and once they established monopoly control over the internet, they turned against free speech.
The following article from Joseph Jankowski at PlanetFreeWill.com is an excellent overview of the betrayal of the tech giants. It also reveals why, as I’ve stated previously, for humanity to survive, Google must be defeated.
It’s time for every human being, nation and government in the world to declare war on Google and Facebook. They must be utterly dismantled, and their criminal cartel CEOs must be arrested and charged with carrying out coordinated crimes against humanity.
Watch my video here, and then read the full story from Joseph Jankowski, below:

https://www.aircrap.org/2018/10/17/why-its-time-to-arrest-the-ceos-of-google-and-facebook/



Big tech companies such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube have performed “perhaps the greatest bait-and-switch in American history” as they now have committed to an about-face to the American value of free speech.
That is the assessment of Breitbart New‘s Allum Bokhari who exclusively presented a leaked Google internal briefing titled “The Good Censor” to the public on October 9th, exposing the world once again to major tech companies’ attitude towards the bedrock of traditional American attitude.
“The Good Censor” is an 85-page briefing that openly admits that Google and other tech platforms are undertaking a “shift towards censorship” in response to unwelcome political events around the world. Unsurprisingly – especially afterleaked video showed google employees in an emotional meltdown after the election victory of Donald J. Trump – The Good Censor cites the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the rise of the populist Alternative for Deutschland (AfD) party in Germany as unwelcomed events.
While admitting the shift away from free speech it is also simultaneously admitted that those select few giants “control the majority of online conversations.”
The briefing goes into how Google, Facebook, Twitter and Youtube are stuck in a position of going along with the “unmediated marketplace of ideas” (free speech and free markets) vs. “well-ordered spaces for safety and civility” (censorship). These two directions are also described as the “American tradition” which “prioritizes free speech for democracy, not civility” and the “European tradition,” which “favors dignity over liberty and civility over freedom.” The internal pages claim that all tech platforms are now moving toward the European tradition.
Perhaps the most significant part of the brief, as Breitbart’s Bokhari reports, is when it associates Google’s new role as the guarantor of “civility” with the categories of “editor” and “publisher.”

This is significant, given that Google, YouTube, and other tech giants publicly claim they are not publishers but rather neutral platforms — a categorization that grants them special legal immunities under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Elsewhere in the document, Google admits that Section 230 was designed to ensure they can remain neutral platforms for free expression.

Bokhari wrote on Wednesday:

What ordinary Americans long suspected, The Good Censor has proven beyond doubt. According to Google’s own analysis, tech companies have performed perhaps the greatest bait-and-switch in American history, promising their users free speech while they were taking over the market, only to go back on their word once they came to “control the majority of online conversations.”

What better example to prove this bait-and-switch than the statement given by Sinead McSweeney, Twitter’s vice president for public policy and communications in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa who told British politicians at the end of last year that it’s “no longer possible to stand up for all speech.”
Just 5 years prior, Twitter’s first executive in the UK, Tony Wang, described the company as “the free-speech wing of the free-speech party.”
The once acceptance and defense of free speech by these big tech players is discussed in The Good Censor, as the document reads: “This free speech ideal was instilled in the DNA of the Silicon Valley startups that now control the majority of our online conversations.”
And while Google hubrisly boasts that its free speech bait-and-switch has placed them and a few other giants as controllers of “the majority of online conversations” (aka the majority of all conversation happening on earth) the company has come out and finally admitted directly that it has a censored Chinese search engine project in the works. What better guarantor of “civility”, “publisher, “editor” could the masses of internet users wish to oversee the majority of online conversation?
See more at PlanetFreeWill.com.


Thanks to: https://www.aircrap.org

Facebook shareholders back proposal to remove Zuckerberg as chairman
Date: October 17, 2018Author: Nwo Report 

(Reuters) – Several public funds that hold shares in Facebook Inc on Wednesday backed a proposal to remove Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg as chairman, saying the social media giant mishandled several high-profile scandals.

State treasurers from Illinois, Rhode Island and Pennsylvania, and New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer, co-filed the proposal. They joined hedge fund Trillium Asset Management, which bought it to the table in June.

The proposal, set to be voted on at Facebook’s annual shareholder meeting in May 2019, is asking the board to make the role of chair an independent position.
“Facebook plays an outsized role in our society and our economy. They have a social and financial responsibility to be transparent – that’s why we’re demanding independence and accountability in the company’s boardroom,” Stringer said.
Facebook declined to comment.
In 2017, a similar proposal to appoint an independent chair was voted down.
In opposing the proposal, Facebook said an independent chair could “cause uncertainty, confusion, and inefficiency in board and management function and relations”.
Zuckerberg has about 60 percent voting rights, according to a company filing in April.

The New York City Pension Funds owned about 4.5 million Facebook shares as of July 31, while Trillium held 53,000 shares.
The Pennsylvania Treasury held 38,737 shares and the Illinois Treasury owned 190,712 shares as of August.
Shares held by the Rhode Island Treasury were not immediately available.


Thanks to: https://nworeport.me

Just shut them down, and be done with it, as all it does is cause trouble and issues for the masses-It was a very big mistake to begin with-If anyone wants to talk, or send pictures, make a phone call, or mail the pictures, how hard is that? #uckerberg and all the rest of the 'tech giants' should go to prison anyway- They knew EXACTLY what their plans were, and what they were doing-

I think we will make sure the LibTards are securely out of reach of any sort of power positions... Shouldn't be too difficult as most of them are headed for the 'Grey Bar Hotel'...