Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax
Posted by nesaraaustralia ⋅ January 10, 2013 ⋅ Leave a Comment
Filed Under immunization schedules, national vaccination, research, science, vaccination schedules
If you have children, you are more than likely already aware of
the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
“Immunization Schedules,” which today recommend an astounding 29
vaccines be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly
flu shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and
18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/).
But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic,
Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents
exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the
fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against
disease.
Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system’s
elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination
program, the tenets of the study’s findings still apply to vaccination
schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of
serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government
authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private
goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent
information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from
parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And
in the process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of
serious side effects and death.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance
Through several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr.
Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were
held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization
(JCVI), a so-called “independent expert advisory committee” that makes
recommendations to the government about vaccine policy,
and various British health ministers over the years. And after poring
through this plethora of information, which had previously been veiled
from public view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
“[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made
continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions
and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health
practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they
deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity,’ a concept which … does not
rest on solid scientific evidence,” explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the
introduction to her paper.
“Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH)
and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been
engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole
purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.”
These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr.
Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely
ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the
ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored
unfavorable data that shed a “negative” light on vaccines in order to
maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this,
the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities
about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to
vaccinate their kids.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins
outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the
JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to
protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from
these meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe
side effects associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping
cough (pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to
causing severe brain damage in a substantial percentage of the children
that received them.
Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on
the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years
before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet,
JCVI was already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological
Standards and Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR
and vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come
forward with this information and call for further safety assessments on
the vaccine, the JCVI instead censored this critical information from
the public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.
“The extent of the JCVI’s concerns with the implications of
scientific assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why
they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological
disorders following vaccination,” writes Dr. Tomljenovic. “[I]nstead of
re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns
were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy
based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.”
In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the
reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other
questionable vaccines, than with protecting children from sustaining
serious injuries as a result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR
vaccine is concerned, this critical piece of information not only
reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield’s findings from 10 years
later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the
establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long this scam
has been taking place.
Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines
If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious
amounts of information on the JCVI’s longtime habit of encouraging
vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to
make dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in
accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI’s guidance
contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match those of the
vaccine’s manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to
alter its data sheets to avoid “legal problems.”
Similarly, the JCVI’s official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable
studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on
independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy
recommendations. Once again, the JCVI’s position on the safety and
effectiveness of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat
out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk
studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves
nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the 31 studies it
evaluated did not even meet the group’s basic methodological criteria.
“Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine
as safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant,
inconclusive, or methodologically questionable,” explains Dr.
Tomljenovic, adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed
epidemiological studies that only identified “association” rather than
“causation,” a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the
establishment typically is of studies that contradict its own
positions.
The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine
schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine
safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the
promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through
deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the
widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and
scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.
Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Sources for this article include:
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com
http://foodfreedomgroup.com
Source: NaturalNews.com
Thanks to: http://nesaraaustralia.com
Posted by nesaraaustralia ⋅ January 10, 2013 ⋅ Leave a Comment
Filed Under immunization schedules, national vaccination, research, science, vaccination schedules
If you have children, you are more than likely already aware of
the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
“Immunization Schedules,” which today recommend an astounding 29
vaccines be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly
flu shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and
18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/).
But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic,
Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents
exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the
fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against
disease.
Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system’s
elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination
program, the tenets of the study’s findings still apply to vaccination
schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of
serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government
authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private
goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent
information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from
parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And
in the process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of
serious side effects and death.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance
Through several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr.
Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were
held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization
(JCVI), a so-called “independent expert advisory committee” that makes
recommendations to the government about vaccine policy,
and various British health ministers over the years. And after poring
through this plethora of information, which had previously been veiled
from public view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.
“[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made
continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions
and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health
practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they
deemed were necessary for ‘herd immunity,’ a concept which … does not
rest on solid scientific evidence,” explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the
introduction to her paper.
“Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH)
and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been
engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole
purpose of protecting the national vaccination program.”
These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr.
Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely
ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the
ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored
unfavorable data that shed a “negative” light on vaccines in order to
maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this,
the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities
about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to
vaccinate their kids.
You can access Dr. Tomljenovic’s full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins
outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the
JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to
protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from
these meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe
side effects associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping
cough (pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to
causing severe brain damage in a substantial percentage of the children
that received them.
Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on
the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years
before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet,
JCVI was already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological
Standards and Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR
and vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come
forward with this information and call for further safety assessments on
the vaccine, the JCVI instead censored this critical information from
the public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.
“The extent of the JCVI’s concerns with the implications of
scientific assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why
they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological
disorders following vaccination,” writes Dr. Tomljenovic. “[I]nstead of
re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns
were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy
based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time.”
In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the
reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other
questionable vaccines, than with protecting children from sustaining
serious injuries as a result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR
vaccine is concerned, this critical piece of information not only
reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield’s findings from 10 years
later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the
establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long this scam
has been taking place.
Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines
If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious
amounts of information on the JCVI’s longtime habit of encouraging
vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to
make dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in
accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI’s guidance
contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match those of the
vaccine’s manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to
alter its data sheets to avoid “legal problems.”
Similarly, the JCVI’s official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable
studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on
independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy
recommendations. Once again, the JCVI’s position on the safety and
effectiveness of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat
out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk
studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves
nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the 31 studies it
evaluated did not even meet the group’s basic methodological criteria.
“Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine
as safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant,
inconclusive, or methodologically questionable,” explains Dr.
Tomljenovic, adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed
epidemiological studies that only identified “association” rather than
“causation,” a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the
establishment typically is of studies that contradict its own
positions.
The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine
schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine
safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the
promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through
deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the
widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and
scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.
Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
Sources for this article include:
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com
http://foodfreedomgroup.com
Source: NaturalNews.com
Thanks to: http://nesaraaustralia.com
