Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Financial Tyranny Collapsing at Free-Fall Speed
| Print |
by David Wilcock
July 14, 2013, 12:22 am
Financial tyranny is now crumbling apart so fast we can barely keep up with all the new information. Thousands of years ago, the "what", "when" and "why" of everything we are seeing now was predicted -- by ancient cultures spanning the globe.
In a three-hour Russian TV special, one-hour radio show, and a bold new article, David Wilcock explores the fulfillment of this long-prophesied shift in human consciousness!
[Some additional updates may appear on or around Monday, including more graphics and "pullquotes" to spruce things up a bit -- but the text is here now.]
A WILD AND WONDERFUL RIDE
For those who were following the story, the Mayan Calendar seemed to be a huge disappointment. At first.
Nothing appeared to have happened on the all-important date of December 21, 2012 -- even though grandiose-sounding prophecies concerning this window of time appear in over 30 different ancient cultures.
I review some of the key points of this story in the free OM Times article and one-hour radio show linked in this piece.
The biggest thing that happened to me in December 2012 was that I was filmed twice -- by a top Russian TV network.
These interviews were soon featured in six hours of prime-time documentary footage on REN-TV, which was all built out of my epic ebook, Financial Tyranny.
These documentaries aired on January 16th and January 30th, 2013 -- and electrified the Russian public. The truth was right there -- on prime-time broadcast television.
Now, you can watch the three-hour series' conclusion -- with complete English subtitles -- and help blow the lid off of the greatest cover-up in human history.
WAS IT A COINCIDENCE?
Germany asked for a sizable portion of their gold back from the Federal Reserve on the very same day that the first of these documentaries aired -- January 16th, 2013.
Was this a mere coincidence? Or was it a blatantly obvious political move against the Establishment -- and its control of the media, not to mention the world's gold?
Now, six months later, the hidden truth is being revealed so quickly that our team is spending hours a day just identifying, documenting and archiving all the new information.
The story is literally evolving on a day-by-day basis. It's hard to know when to stop and write about it, because new information is coming in so fast we can barely keep up with it.
This is no time for laziness. Things are moving far too quickly to even afford to take a single day off.
Priceless, astonishing new information is rising and falling like a furious tide -- crashing against a rocky shore. Up and down. Up and down.
If we don't grab each new piece as soon as it surfaces, it can disappear on the very next wave.
CLINGING TO THE RIVERBANK
You may still be clinging to the riverbank, struggling like mad not to let go.
You may still not be prepared to plunge into the wild, terrifying and invigorating "white water" ride of Disclosure.
Nonetheless, just as we have been expecting, disclosure is happening now.
If you ever wondered about what disclosure would actually look like once it started happening, this is it.
As we are now seeing, it cannot be constrained into one single, all-defining moment where "everything happens".
We do not all wake up with a single, streamlined, easy-to-understand story that everyone believes... where all of a sudden the world has changed forever.
This is a massive, systematic, and total shift in what the average person knows, thinks and believes to be true -- on the most basic level.
It is an exciting opportunity to completely "start over" with the basic nature of civilization as we know it -- and build a much happier and healthier world.
THE REAL STORY IS MUCH BIGGER THAN WHAT WE ARE NOW SEEING
The amount of information that has been classified and hidden from us is so vast that it literally takes years of study just to understand the basics of it.
There may only be a few thousand people on earth -- if that -- who really know what the heck is going on.
The closest that most of us ever get to this world is in our imagination... as we watch various science fiction movies and TV shows that have systematically leaked -- and distorted -- the truth.
Even within the classified programs themselves, there is so much compartmentalization that very few workers with a security clearance ever get to see the Big Picture.
I have had extensive, personal access to at least four major insiders who DO see the Big Picture -- or at least a majority of it.
Each of them have worked at levels where most of the hidden information is common knowledge -- and they have access to many of the compartments.
Other insiders have revealed key facets of this astonishingly brilliant jewel.
The information is precious beyond belief -- as it has the power to utterly transform our world.
THE SECRECY INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN REVEALED -- BUT NOT THE SECRETS IT WAS BUILT TO PROTECT
The NSA is considered a low-level group within this greater hierarchy.
Surveillance is a long, tedious job of "dumpster diving" -- hoping to find a few stray treats in the process.
Surveillance is like being the security guard outside a gorgeous royal palace.
You stand there -- and you listen, listen, listen. Watch everyone. Suspect everything. Trust nothing... and no one... except the hierarchy itself.
Couriers meet with you, pass along information, and you pass it along to someone else who works inside. Go home, go to sleep, get up and do it again.
Although occasionally you get served a nice, fancy dinner, you have little to no idea about what is really going on inside the palace.
Your job is simply to identify and eliminate the threats to the Crown. You are only told as much as you need to know to do your job.
Right now, the security infrastructure that protects this extensive, compartmentalized world of secrets is being widely and openly revealed -- for the first time.
However, the secrets of what is going on "inside the palace" have barely even started to be identified and appreciated on a mass level.
THE PATTERN OF DISCLOSURE HAS NOW BECOME OBVIOUS
The pattern that disclosure will take has now become obvious.
You can extrapolate from what is already happening and have a good idea of where this is going.
"New" information comes out... and the public then realizes the truth was there all along, waiting to be appreciated.
"New" whistleblowers come out... and the public then realizes many other whistleblowers risked their lives to tell us the same things, years ago -- and were ignored.
It is natural for the human ego to deploy the full arsenal of "defense mechanisms" against the truth -- including the all-time favorite method of attacking the messenger.
Unless you are "completely brand-new to all of this," you have undoubtedly suffered these sarcastic, belittling attacks yourself. Many times.
Now, you are finally starting to be vindicated -- for having known and discussed things that are quickly becoming common knowledge.
Your vindication has only just begun. 2013 is indeed the year of the "I-told-ya-so party" -- and we're only halfway through it so far.
NSA DISCLOSURES ARE NOT PART OF AN ISOLATED EVENT
The main focus of my work in the last two months has been to integrate an astonishing range of data showing how a systematic, coordinated effort is being made, behind-the-scenes, to tell us the truth.
These "leaks" are not random. They are not arbitrary. There is a very strong, focused, coordinated effort underway to reveal the truth -- with exacting precision.
This disclosure is NOT being orchestrated by the Cabal / New World Order / Federal Reserve / Illuminati / Bad Guys -- which is centered in the US, UK and Western Europe.
Although many people who read "truth media" like to disbelieve every single news event they see, it is quite obvious that Snowden is not "controlled opposition."
Isn't it interesting that Snowden ended up in Russia -- and is still there -- given what we revealed in the last article about how Russia is the geopolitical center of an international alliance that is defeating the Cabal?
This seemed like the best time to release Part Two of the epic six-hour Russian expose' of Financial Tyranny -- which was built off of the huge ebook I published here, for free, in January 2012.
The day before Snowden identified himself as the NSA leaker, we published a whole article revealing that Russia has been working to defeat the Cabal ever since the year it started -- in 1776 -- as the "Bavarian Illuminati."
ALL FACTIONS OF THE CABAL WANTED SECRECY
We are not in a game of "problem / reaction / solution," where the Cabal creates the problem and then presents a "solution" that takes away even more of our freedoms.
Though there are at least three major, warring factions in the Cabal at this point, not including the Alliance, the one thing they've all agreed on is secrecy.
As soon as the public discovers the truth, in mass numbers, the Cabal can no longer maintain control. None of its factions can. It's that simple.
The public is far too powerful to control -- once they become aware of the extent to which they are being lied to, spied upon and manipulated.
Ignorance, superstition, fear and disbelief is absolutely necessary to keep the game going.
For that same reason, it is astonishing, and deeply gratifying, to see this all happening now.
Excellent, pulse-pounding movies will be written about the times we are now in -- for many years to come.
YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHIN' YET
I can now talk openly with a "normal person" about subjects that would have gotten me a sarcastic rebuttal, a cold silence, an obsequious defense of the System, or a sudden change of subject only three months ago.
The "burden of wisdom" that we have been carrying, thanklessly, for so long is now starting to be shared by everyone on earth.
Furthermore, if you think that most of the "new information" is over and done with, and life will just go on, all I can say is:You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The changes these events will produce have barely even started. This will shock and surprise even the most battle-weary, hardened cynics and skeptics.
Thankfully, what we will get out of all this is NOT doom, fear, catastrophe and loss of freedom.
It will be precisely the opposite.
ONLY A MINOR PLAYER
The NSA is only a minor player in comparison to organizations like the NRO, Naval intelligence, Air Force intelligence and many other groups behind the UFO cover-up.
However, many, if not most of the personnel and leadership in these organizations are NOT sociopathic. They are patriots who DO want to tell us the truth -- and improve our world.
Secrecy is a burden that most of these personnel would love to release -- even just in their day-to-day life at home with their families.
I do believe a positive international alliance is orchestrating this ever-increasing disclosure of new information -- behind the scenes.
Some members of this alliance are still working within the intelligence services themselves as well -- under deep cover, in fear for their lives.
DISCLOSURE IS HAPPENING AS FAST AS IT CAN REASONABLY BE DONE
I do also believe that they are releasing new leaks as fast as they possibly can, without completely overwhelming us.
The public needs time to digest each new piece of information -- and right now it's a huge feast, with hundreds of intriguing new items to choose from.
The stories are getting wilder by the day. Things that would have seemed impossible to believe even two months ago now seem entirely plausible, if not obvious.
Let's examine one minor example of something that may still sound "crazy" today, but might become common knowledge in as little as another month or two.
This is one example that will make people really pissed off -- if it turns out to be true.
We need more of those kinds of revelations right now -- to break through the incredible denial, and understand the truth.
REMOTE-CONTROLLED AUTOMOBILES: LEGALLY REQUIRED IN THE U.S. SINCE 2008?
What if ALL new cars sold in America for the last five years -- all makes and models from 2008 and up -- can be remote-controlled by certain insider groups?
What if this system is designed so that it can fully override the actions of the driver?
What if all automakers were required, by a secret and unconstitutional law, to install this system in their vehicles -- to "protect" the public?
Would this not violate the fourth amendment of the US Constitution against "unreasonable seizures" of personal property?
Does the Cabal now possess the technology to achieve a blatantly unconstitutional feat of this scope and caliber?
Could they quietly install GPS systems, tiny smartphone-sized video cameras, power steering, power brakes and acceleration control in vehicles?
Why do most cars now have a push-button starter system -- and no longer require you to stick a key in the ignition?
Could it be possible to send these cars a signal to start up -- without the "key" being in the car at all?
Could someone use these automated systems to pilot the car at a distance: to steer, to accelerate, decelerate, brake, and watch where they're going?
What could a person or group do if they had this capability? Should we entrust them with this power -- if the truth were to be widely known?
ONSTAR IS ALREADY PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
We already know the OnStar service gives unseen groups a surprisingly high amount of control over a motor vehicle.
The "bad guys" we're supposedly being protected from would already know about this -- and disable it -- in any car they would actually use.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/onstar.htm
Being in a car accident is a nightmare -- you're often disoriented, upset and unsure of what to do once the actual crash is over. But if your car is equipped with GM's OnStar service, you don't even have to find your cell phone.
The system can get help for you. It can also check your e-mail hands-free, make hotel reservations, and unlock your car if you've locked your keys inside, among other things.
OnStar is the most popular telematics service available in North America. As of May 2005, it had more than 4 million customers [ref].
But what is a telematics service? How does OnStar know where you are, and how can your car let the OnStar Call Center know that you've been in an accident?
In this article, we'll explore the technology behind OnStar, find out how to use it, and learn about some of thecontroversy associated with it....
ONSTAR PUBLICLY ADMITTED TO BE IN ALL GM's MANUFACTURED SINCE 2007
GM admits that all of their vehicles since 2007 are equipped with extensive, remote-control automated systems -- via OnStar.
http://cartech.about.com/od/Safety/a/Gms-Onstar-Service-How-Does-It-Work.htm
OnStar is included with all new GM vehicles, and some non-GM vehicles also include it.
You may find these systems in certain Japanese and European vehicles that were manufactured between the 2002 and 2005 model years.
Acura, Isuzu, and Subaru were the Japanese automakers that were party to the deal, and both Audi and Volkswagen signed on as well.
If you purchase a GM vehicle that was produced during or after the 2007 model year, it may also include a subscription to OnStar.
After that [2007] model year, all new GM vehicles come with a subscription [to OnStar, meaning all the tech is fully installed].
WHAT-ALL CAN ON-STAR DO?
A "subscription" to OnStar may not really be the proper term for this, considering that it is an extensive, fully automated remote-control system that is installed in your car, whether you want it or not.
Power steering uses computerized electrical motors to push the tires in the direction you tell them to go -- when you turn the wheel.
Could these motors be strong enough to force your steering wheel to move in ways you cannot control? Can a mechanical motor be stronger than your arms?
Why would Acura, Isuzu, Subaru, Audi and Volkswagen all pull back from officially using this system as a selling point in any of their cars... since 2005?
WERE TOP EXECUTIVES FORCED TO GO ALONG WITH IT?
Were these systems still being installed by these various car manufacturers, and others, after they officially stopped including them in 2005?
Were they required to go quiet about it? Would their top executives have been threatened or killed if they ever tried to resist?
Will they all rush to defend themselves, and say they were forced to do it, if an insidious-sounding story like this ever broke through into the mainstream?
Since most of the assembly line for an automobile is now automated with robotics, would most of the employees even be aware that such a system was hiding in the electronics?
Could a tiny camera, mounted in the rearview mirror, for example, give a real-time view of the road via a Skype call to the groups who have access to it?
LET'S GET INTO THE SPECIFICS
Let's look at another quote that publicly reveals how much we already know about the OnStar system.
http://cartech.about.com/od/Safety/a/Gms-Onstar-Service-How-Does-It-Work_2.htm
OnStar is a subsidiary corporation of General Motors that provides a variety of in-vehicle services, which are alldelivered via a CDMA cellular connection....
General Motors established OnStar in 1995 with cooperation from Hughes Electronics and Electronic Data Systems, and the first OnStar units were made available in several Cadillac models for the 1997 model year.
OnStar is primarily available in GM vehicles, though a licensing agreement also made OnStar available in several other makes between 2002 and 2005....
Some OnStar systems can also perform other functions that might make it easier to recover a stolen vehicle.
If the police have verified that a vehicle was stolen, an OnStar representative may be able to issue a command to the OBD-II system that will slow the vehicle down.
This functionality has been used during high-speed car chases to stop thieves in their tracks. Some vehicles are also equipped with the ability to remotely disable the ignition system.
That means if the thief shuts your vehicle off, he won’t be able to start it back up again.
What else Can OnStar Do for Me?
Since OnStar has access to many of your vehicle's systems, there are a number of ways that an OnStar operator can help out if you're in a bind.
In many cases, OnStar can unlock your vehicle if you accidentally lock your keys inside.
[DW: The system would therefore also be able to lock you in, and prevent your escape, while the car is accelerating outside of your control.]
The system may also be able to flash your lights or honk your horn if you're unable to find your vehicle in a crowded parking lot.
OBVIOUS PRIVACY CONCERNS
This next excerpt reveals that there were already serious privacy concerns with this technology -- BEFORE all the NSA disclosures we are now seeing.
Bear in mind that cheap, tiny cameras could also be installed inside the vehicle's cabin -- so the driver and passengers could be monitored in real time.
http://cartech.about.com/od/Safety/a/Gms-Onstar-Service-How-Does-It-Work_2.htm
OnStar has access to a lot of data about your driving habits, so some people have expressed concerns about privacy issues.
The FBI has even attempted to use the system to eavesdrop on private conversations, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied them the ability to do so.
[DW: And of course, we all know we can trust the FBI and other agencies to follow court orders.]
OnStar is also set up so that it makes an obvious noise whenever an operator places an incoming call, which makes it impossible for an unscrupulous operator to eavesdrop.
[DW: Couldn't they also install a bypass switch to disable the "obvious noise" of an incoming call -- when certain groups wanted to listen in?]
OnStar also claims that it anonymizes GPS data before selling it to third parties, but this remains a privacy concern.
While the data may not be tied directly to your name or the VIN of your car or truck, GPS data is by its very nature not anonymous.
GM also purportedly tracks this data even after you cancel your OnStar subscription, though it is possible to completely sever the data connection.
HOW WOULD THEY DEAL WITH IT?
Let's imagine that a "crazy" idea like "All vehicles sold in the US since 2008 are legally required to be remote-controllable" were to be disclosed, publicly, by a whistleblower.
(I have no idea if that will ever actually happen. It's only a hypothetical question at this point -- but some insiders have suggested this may be the case, as we will see.)
What would the official response be? Would they say this remote-control piloting system was only being used to stop criminals, dope dealers and terrorists?
Could these systems also be used for targeted assassinations -- making cars accelerate really fast, without the operator's control, and then steering them into a tree while locking the driver inside?
Could power groups then use this to "take out" people who threaten them -- like journalists chasing a major new story?
How many drivers would think fast enough to realize what was happening, have a good tool on hand to smash out a window, and jump out before the impact?
Would we entrust our "leaders" to be able to completely take control of our vehicles, and remotely pilot them, without our consent -- if this were publicly known?
How far would the "I have nothing to hide" argument get you at that point?
ARE THESE SYSTEMS BEING MISUSED?
Let's say there is a Cabal of insiders who are jealously protecting their secrets -- and defending their corporate interests against whistleblowers.
Up until recently, the majority of people in Western society might not have believed that something this massive and ugly could be true -- but that's all changing now.
A remote-control system like OnStar may have been responsible for the death of journalist Michael Hastings, who died in a fiery, high-speed car crash.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
Hastings was driving a 2013 Mercedes C250 coupe when he crashed into a tree on Highland Ave. in Los Angeles at approximately 4:30 am on June 18.
Video posted online showed the car in flames, and one neighbor told a local news crew she heard a sound like an explosion.
Another eyewitness said the car's engine had been thrown 50 to 60 yards from the car. There were no other vehicles involved in the accident.
The fire was so all-consuming that it took the Los Angeles County coroner's office two days to identify Hastings' body....
WHAT WAS HASTINGS WRITING ABOUT?
As our excerpt goes on, we find that Hastings had already been very effective at upsetting the existing power structure.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
Hastings practiced a brand of no-holds-barred journalism that tended to anger powerful people.
His 2010 profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, published in Rolling Stone, was so damaging that it ostensibly prompted President Barack Obama to fire the general (the president denied that the article had a role in his decision).
In the days before his death, Hastings was reportedly working on a story about a lawsuit filed by Jill Kelley, who was involved in the scandal that brought down Gen. David Petraeus, according to the LA Times.
KTLA reported that Hastings told colleagues at the news site BuzzFeed that he feared the FBI was investigating him.
On June 20, the FBI denied that any investigation was under way.
It is possible that Hastings was under a lot of pressure, got drunk, and went for a joyride. It is also possible that he was assassinated.
Was this fiery crash intended to stop Hastings from breaking his story, and intimidate other journalists from coming forward at the same time?
It is certainly true that the speed of new information leaks in the mainstream media decreased after Hastings' death, for almost two weeks, before it picked back up again.
However, even with strongly obvious, Mafia-style "hits" like this being openly conducted, there is no stopping the avalanche of disclosure.
After working hard to reveal the truth for so many years, I am relieved to see it all coming out now -- even though it is an incredible amount of work to try to keep up with all the new information now emerging.
WAS MICHAEL HASTINGS ASSASSINATED BY VEHICULAR REMOTE CONTROL?
These excerpts reveal that the fiery death of this journalist may have been intentional -- as he was working on a very major story right before it happened.
Wikileaks Says Michael Hastings Contacted Them Just Before Death
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100222652/wikileaks-says-michael-hastings-contacted-it-just-before-his-death-are-they-implying-he-was-murdered/
WikiLeaks just threw some gasoline onto the conspiracy fire. On Wednesday night, they Tweeted: “Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him.”….
And Hastings’ last article was about the evils of the NSA – which ended with the tantalising line, “Perhaps more information will soon be forthcoming.” Glenn Greenwald Tweeted a link to the piece after Hastings' death.
Hastings Said FBI Was Investigating Him
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/06/19/wikileaks-hastings-said-he-was-being-investigated-by-fbi/
CULVER CITY (CBSLA.com) — Questions persist following the death of Michael Hastings Tuesday, after reports that the award-winning journalist told WikiLeaks the government was watching him.
WikiLeaks tweeted a message to their millions of followers Wednesday stating that the 33-year-old author and war correspondent had contacted the organization’s lawyer to say he was being watched by the FBI….
Police have not yet confirmed that the person killed was Hastings because the body was reportedly burned beyond recognition.
One friend who declined to speak on camera said Hastings was very paranoid that he was being watched by the FBI, but that it is too soon to speculate on the conspiracy theories surrounding his death.
WHISTLEBLOWER REVEALS CARS CAN BE "HACKED"
Senior, high-ranking whistleblower Richard Clarke revealed to The Huffington Post that there are indeed ways to gain remote control of a vehicle, based on his insider knowledge.
If you read between the lines, Clarke appears to know a lot more about this system than what he has officially revealed in his statement.
Senior Insider Richard Clarke Reveals Cars Can Be Remote-Controlled
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
The peculiar circumstances of journalist Michael Hastings' death in Los Angeles last week have unleashed a wave of conspiracy theories.
Now there's another theory to contribute to the paranoia: According to a prominent security analyst, technology exists that could've allowed someone to hack his car.
Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post that what is known about the single-vehicle crash is "consistent with a car cyber attack."
Clarke said, "There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers" -- including the United States -- know how to remotely seize control of a car.
"What has been revealed as a result of some research at universities is that it's relatively easy to hack your way into the control system of a car, and to do such things as cause acceleration when the driver doesn't want acceleration, to throw on the brakes when the driver doesn't want the brakes on, to launch an air bag," Clarke told The Huffington Post.
"You can do some really highly destructive things now, through hacking a car, and it's not that hard."
"So if there were a cyber attack on the car -- and I'm not saying there was," Clarke added, "I think whoever did it would probably get away with it."
| Print |
by David Wilcock
July 14, 2013, 12:22 am
Financial tyranny is now crumbling apart so fast we can barely keep up with all the new information. Thousands of years ago, the "what", "when" and "why" of everything we are seeing now was predicted -- by ancient cultures spanning the globe.
In a three-hour Russian TV special, one-hour radio show, and a bold new article, David Wilcock explores the fulfillment of this long-prophesied shift in human consciousness!
[Some additional updates may appear on or around Monday, including more graphics and "pullquotes" to spruce things up a bit -- but the text is here now.]
A WILD AND WONDERFUL RIDE
For those who were following the story, the Mayan Calendar seemed to be a huge disappointment. At first.
Nothing appeared to have happened on the all-important date of December 21, 2012 -- even though grandiose-sounding prophecies concerning this window of time appear in over 30 different ancient cultures.
I review some of the key points of this story in the free OM Times article and one-hour radio show linked in this piece.
The biggest thing that happened to me in December 2012 was that I was filmed twice -- by a top Russian TV network.
These interviews were soon featured in six hours of prime-time documentary footage on REN-TV, which was all built out of my epic ebook, Financial Tyranny.
These documentaries aired on January 16th and January 30th, 2013 -- and electrified the Russian public. The truth was right there -- on prime-time broadcast television.
Now, you can watch the three-hour series' conclusion -- with complete English subtitles -- and help blow the lid off of the greatest cover-up in human history.
WAS IT A COINCIDENCE?
Germany asked for a sizable portion of their gold back from the Federal Reserve on the very same day that the first of these documentaries aired -- January 16th, 2013.
Was this a mere coincidence? Or was it a blatantly obvious political move against the Establishment -- and its control of the media, not to mention the world's gold?
Now, six months later, the hidden truth is being revealed so quickly that our team is spending hours a day just identifying, documenting and archiving all the new information.
The story is literally evolving on a day-by-day basis. It's hard to know when to stop and write about it, because new information is coming in so fast we can barely keep up with it.
This is no time for laziness. Things are moving far too quickly to even afford to take a single day off.
Priceless, astonishing new information is rising and falling like a furious tide -- crashing against a rocky shore. Up and down. Up and down.
If we don't grab each new piece as soon as it surfaces, it can disappear on the very next wave.
CLINGING TO THE RIVERBANK
You may still be clinging to the riverbank, struggling like mad not to let go.
You may still not be prepared to plunge into the wild, terrifying and invigorating "white water" ride of Disclosure.
Nonetheless, just as we have been expecting, disclosure is happening now.
If you ever wondered about what disclosure would actually look like once it started happening, this is it.
As we are now seeing, it cannot be constrained into one single, all-defining moment where "everything happens".
We do not all wake up with a single, streamlined, easy-to-understand story that everyone believes... where all of a sudden the world has changed forever.
This is a massive, systematic, and total shift in what the average person knows, thinks and believes to be true -- on the most basic level.
It is an exciting opportunity to completely "start over" with the basic nature of civilization as we know it -- and build a much happier and healthier world.
THE REAL STORY IS MUCH BIGGER THAN WHAT WE ARE NOW SEEING
The amount of information that has been classified and hidden from us is so vast that it literally takes years of study just to understand the basics of it.
There may only be a few thousand people on earth -- if that -- who really know what the heck is going on.
The closest that most of us ever get to this world is in our imagination... as we watch various science fiction movies and TV shows that have systematically leaked -- and distorted -- the truth.
Even within the classified programs themselves, there is so much compartmentalization that very few workers with a security clearance ever get to see the Big Picture.
I have had extensive, personal access to at least four major insiders who DO see the Big Picture -- or at least a majority of it.
Each of them have worked at levels where most of the hidden information is common knowledge -- and they have access to many of the compartments.
Other insiders have revealed key facets of this astonishingly brilliant jewel.
The information is precious beyond belief -- as it has the power to utterly transform our world.
THE SECRECY INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN REVEALED -- BUT NOT THE SECRETS IT WAS BUILT TO PROTECT
The NSA is considered a low-level group within this greater hierarchy.
Surveillance is a long, tedious job of "dumpster diving" -- hoping to find a few stray treats in the process.
Surveillance is like being the security guard outside a gorgeous royal palace.
You stand there -- and you listen, listen, listen. Watch everyone. Suspect everything. Trust nothing... and no one... except the hierarchy itself.
Couriers meet with you, pass along information, and you pass it along to someone else who works inside. Go home, go to sleep, get up and do it again.
Although occasionally you get served a nice, fancy dinner, you have little to no idea about what is really going on inside the palace.
Your job is simply to identify and eliminate the threats to the Crown. You are only told as much as you need to know to do your job.
Right now, the security infrastructure that protects this extensive, compartmentalized world of secrets is being widely and openly revealed -- for the first time.
However, the secrets of what is going on "inside the palace" have barely even started to be identified and appreciated on a mass level.
THE PATTERN OF DISCLOSURE HAS NOW BECOME OBVIOUS
The pattern that disclosure will take has now become obvious.
You can extrapolate from what is already happening and have a good idea of where this is going.
"New" information comes out... and the public then realizes the truth was there all along, waiting to be appreciated.
"New" whistleblowers come out... and the public then realizes many other whistleblowers risked their lives to tell us the same things, years ago -- and were ignored.
It is natural for the human ego to deploy the full arsenal of "defense mechanisms" against the truth -- including the all-time favorite method of attacking the messenger.
Unless you are "completely brand-new to all of this," you have undoubtedly suffered these sarcastic, belittling attacks yourself. Many times.
Now, you are finally starting to be vindicated -- for having known and discussed things that are quickly becoming common knowledge.
Your vindication has only just begun. 2013 is indeed the year of the "I-told-ya-so party" -- and we're only halfway through it so far.
NSA DISCLOSURES ARE NOT PART OF AN ISOLATED EVENT
The main focus of my work in the last two months has been to integrate an astonishing range of data showing how a systematic, coordinated effort is being made, behind-the-scenes, to tell us the truth.
These "leaks" are not random. They are not arbitrary. There is a very strong, focused, coordinated effort underway to reveal the truth -- with exacting precision.
This disclosure is NOT being orchestrated by the Cabal / New World Order / Federal Reserve / Illuminati / Bad Guys -- which is centered in the US, UK and Western Europe.
Although many people who read "truth media" like to disbelieve every single news event they see, it is quite obvious that Snowden is not "controlled opposition."
Isn't it interesting that Snowden ended up in Russia -- and is still there -- given what we revealed in the last article about how Russia is the geopolitical center of an international alliance that is defeating the Cabal?
This seemed like the best time to release Part Two of the epic six-hour Russian expose' of Financial Tyranny -- which was built off of the huge ebook I published here, for free, in January 2012.
The day before Snowden identified himself as the NSA leaker, we published a whole article revealing that Russia has been working to defeat the Cabal ever since the year it started -- in 1776 -- as the "Bavarian Illuminati."
ALL FACTIONS OF THE CABAL WANTED SECRECY
We are not in a game of "problem / reaction / solution," where the Cabal creates the problem and then presents a "solution" that takes away even more of our freedoms.
Though there are at least three major, warring factions in the Cabal at this point, not including the Alliance, the one thing they've all agreed on is secrecy.
As soon as the public discovers the truth, in mass numbers, the Cabal can no longer maintain control. None of its factions can. It's that simple.
The public is far too powerful to control -- once they become aware of the extent to which they are being lied to, spied upon and manipulated.
Ignorance, superstition, fear and disbelief is absolutely necessary to keep the game going.
For that same reason, it is astonishing, and deeply gratifying, to see this all happening now.
Excellent, pulse-pounding movies will be written about the times we are now in -- for many years to come.
YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHIN' YET
I can now talk openly with a "normal person" about subjects that would have gotten me a sarcastic rebuttal, a cold silence, an obsequious defense of the System, or a sudden change of subject only three months ago.
The "burden of wisdom" that we have been carrying, thanklessly, for so long is now starting to be shared by everyone on earth.
Furthermore, if you think that most of the "new information" is over and done with, and life will just go on, all I can say is:You ain't seen nothin' yet.
The changes these events will produce have barely even started. This will shock and surprise even the most battle-weary, hardened cynics and skeptics.
Thankfully, what we will get out of all this is NOT doom, fear, catastrophe and loss of freedom.
It will be precisely the opposite.
ONLY A MINOR PLAYER
The NSA is only a minor player in comparison to organizations like the NRO, Naval intelligence, Air Force intelligence and many other groups behind the UFO cover-up.
However, many, if not most of the personnel and leadership in these organizations are NOT sociopathic. They are patriots who DO want to tell us the truth -- and improve our world.
Secrecy is a burden that most of these personnel would love to release -- even just in their day-to-day life at home with their families.
I do believe a positive international alliance is orchestrating this ever-increasing disclosure of new information -- behind the scenes.
Some members of this alliance are still working within the intelligence services themselves as well -- under deep cover, in fear for their lives.
DISCLOSURE IS HAPPENING AS FAST AS IT CAN REASONABLY BE DONE
I do also believe that they are releasing new leaks as fast as they possibly can, without completely overwhelming us.
The public needs time to digest each new piece of information -- and right now it's a huge feast, with hundreds of intriguing new items to choose from.
The stories are getting wilder by the day. Things that would have seemed impossible to believe even two months ago now seem entirely plausible, if not obvious.
Let's examine one minor example of something that may still sound "crazy" today, but might become common knowledge in as little as another month or two.
This is one example that will make people really pissed off -- if it turns out to be true.
We need more of those kinds of revelations right now -- to break through the incredible denial, and understand the truth.
REMOTE-CONTROLLED AUTOMOBILES: LEGALLY REQUIRED IN THE U.S. SINCE 2008?
What if ALL new cars sold in America for the last five years -- all makes and models from 2008 and up -- can be remote-controlled by certain insider groups?
What if this system is designed so that it can fully override the actions of the driver?
What if all automakers were required, by a secret and unconstitutional law, to install this system in their vehicles -- to "protect" the public?
Would this not violate the fourth amendment of the US Constitution against "unreasonable seizures" of personal property?
Does the Cabal now possess the technology to achieve a blatantly unconstitutional feat of this scope and caliber?
Could they quietly install GPS systems, tiny smartphone-sized video cameras, power steering, power brakes and acceleration control in vehicles?
Why do most cars now have a push-button starter system -- and no longer require you to stick a key in the ignition?
Could it be possible to send these cars a signal to start up -- without the "key" being in the car at all?
Could someone use these automated systems to pilot the car at a distance: to steer, to accelerate, decelerate, brake, and watch where they're going?
What could a person or group do if they had this capability? Should we entrust them with this power -- if the truth were to be widely known?
ONSTAR IS ALREADY PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE
We already know the OnStar service gives unseen groups a surprisingly high amount of control over a motor vehicle.
The "bad guys" we're supposedly being protected from would already know about this -- and disable it -- in any car they would actually use.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/onstar.htm
Being in a car accident is a nightmare -- you're often disoriented, upset and unsure of what to do once the actual crash is over. But if your car is equipped with GM's OnStar service, you don't even have to find your cell phone.
The system can get help for you. It can also check your e-mail hands-free, make hotel reservations, and unlock your car if you've locked your keys inside, among other things.
OnStar is the most popular telematics service available in North America. As of May 2005, it had more than 4 million customers [ref].
But what is a telematics service? How does OnStar know where you are, and how can your car let the OnStar Call Center know that you've been in an accident?
In this article, we'll explore the technology behind OnStar, find out how to use it, and learn about some of thecontroversy associated with it....
ONSTAR PUBLICLY ADMITTED TO BE IN ALL GM's MANUFACTURED SINCE 2007
GM admits that all of their vehicles since 2007 are equipped with extensive, remote-control automated systems -- via OnStar.
http://cartech.about.com/od/Safety/a/Gms-Onstar-Service-How-Does-It-Work.htm
OnStar is included with all new GM vehicles, and some non-GM vehicles also include it.
You may find these systems in certain Japanese and European vehicles that were manufactured between the 2002 and 2005 model years.
Acura, Isuzu, and Subaru were the Japanese automakers that were party to the deal, and both Audi and Volkswagen signed on as well.
If you purchase a GM vehicle that was produced during or after the 2007 model year, it may also include a subscription to OnStar.
After that [2007] model year, all new GM vehicles come with a subscription [to OnStar, meaning all the tech is fully installed].
WHAT-ALL CAN ON-STAR DO?
A "subscription" to OnStar may not really be the proper term for this, considering that it is an extensive, fully automated remote-control system that is installed in your car, whether you want it or not.
Power steering uses computerized electrical motors to push the tires in the direction you tell them to go -- when you turn the wheel.
Could these motors be strong enough to force your steering wheel to move in ways you cannot control? Can a mechanical motor be stronger than your arms?
Why would Acura, Isuzu, Subaru, Audi and Volkswagen all pull back from officially using this system as a selling point in any of their cars... since 2005?
Image credit: greissdesign / 123RF Stock Photo
Were these systems still being installed by these various car manufacturers, and others, after they officially stopped including them in 2005?
Were they required to go quiet about it? Would their top executives have been threatened or killed if they ever tried to resist?
Will they all rush to defend themselves, and say they were forced to do it, if an insidious-sounding story like this ever broke through into the mainstream?
Since most of the assembly line for an automobile is now automated with robotics, would most of the employees even be aware that such a system was hiding in the electronics?
Could a tiny camera, mounted in the rearview mirror, for example, give a real-time view of the road via a Skype call to the groups who have access to it?
LET'S GET INTO THE SPECIFICS
Let's look at another quote that publicly reveals how much we already know about the OnStar system.
http://cartech.about.com/od/Safety/a/Gms-Onstar-Service-How-Does-It-Work_2.htm
OnStar is a subsidiary corporation of General Motors that provides a variety of in-vehicle services, which are alldelivered via a CDMA cellular connection....
General Motors established OnStar in 1995 with cooperation from Hughes Electronics and Electronic Data Systems, and the first OnStar units were made available in several Cadillac models for the 1997 model year.
OnStar is primarily available in GM vehicles, though a licensing agreement also made OnStar available in several other makes between 2002 and 2005....
Some OnStar systems can also perform other functions that might make it easier to recover a stolen vehicle.
If the police have verified that a vehicle was stolen, an OnStar representative may be able to issue a command to the OBD-II system that will slow the vehicle down.
This functionality has been used during high-speed car chases to stop thieves in their tracks. Some vehicles are also equipped with the ability to remotely disable the ignition system.
That means if the thief shuts your vehicle off, he won’t be able to start it back up again.
What else Can OnStar Do for Me?
Since OnStar has access to many of your vehicle's systems, there are a number of ways that an OnStar operator can help out if you're in a bind.
In many cases, OnStar can unlock your vehicle if you accidentally lock your keys inside.
[DW: The system would therefore also be able to lock you in, and prevent your escape, while the car is accelerating outside of your control.]
The system may also be able to flash your lights or honk your horn if you're unable to find your vehicle in a crowded parking lot.
OBVIOUS PRIVACY CONCERNS
This next excerpt reveals that there were already serious privacy concerns with this technology -- BEFORE all the NSA disclosures we are now seeing.
Bear in mind that cheap, tiny cameras could also be installed inside the vehicle's cabin -- so the driver and passengers could be monitored in real time.
http://cartech.about.com/od/Safety/a/Gms-Onstar-Service-How-Does-It-Work_2.htm
OnStar has access to a lot of data about your driving habits, so some people have expressed concerns about privacy issues.
The FBI has even attempted to use the system to eavesdrop on private conversations, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied them the ability to do so.
[DW: And of course, we all know we can trust the FBI and other agencies to follow court orders.]
OnStar is also set up so that it makes an obvious noise whenever an operator places an incoming call, which makes it impossible for an unscrupulous operator to eavesdrop.
[DW: Couldn't they also install a bypass switch to disable the "obvious noise" of an incoming call -- when certain groups wanted to listen in?]
OnStar also claims that it anonymizes GPS data before selling it to third parties, but this remains a privacy concern.
While the data may not be tied directly to your name or the VIN of your car or truck, GPS data is by its very nature not anonymous.
GM also purportedly tracks this data even after you cancel your OnStar subscription, though it is possible to completely sever the data connection.
HOW WOULD THEY DEAL WITH IT?
Let's imagine that a "crazy" idea like "All vehicles sold in the US since 2008 are legally required to be remote-controllable" were to be disclosed, publicly, by a whistleblower.
(I have no idea if that will ever actually happen. It's only a hypothetical question at this point -- but some insiders have suggested this may be the case, as we will see.)
What would the official response be? Would they say this remote-control piloting system was only being used to stop criminals, dope dealers and terrorists?
Could these systems also be used for targeted assassinations -- making cars accelerate really fast, without the operator's control, and then steering them into a tree while locking the driver inside?
Could power groups then use this to "take out" people who threaten them -- like journalists chasing a major new story?
How many drivers would think fast enough to realize what was happening, have a good tool on hand to smash out a window, and jump out before the impact?
Would we entrust our "leaders" to be able to completely take control of our vehicles, and remotely pilot them, without our consent -- if this were publicly known?
How far would the "I have nothing to hide" argument get you at that point?
ARE THESE SYSTEMS BEING MISUSED?
Let's say there is a Cabal of insiders who are jealously protecting their secrets -- and defending their corporate interests against whistleblowers.
Up until recently, the majority of people in Western society might not have believed that something this massive and ugly could be true -- but that's all changing now.
A remote-control system like OnStar may have been responsible for the death of journalist Michael Hastings, who died in a fiery, high-speed car crash.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
Hastings was driving a 2013 Mercedes C250 coupe when he crashed into a tree on Highland Ave. in Los Angeles at approximately 4:30 am on June 18.
Video posted online showed the car in flames, and one neighbor told a local news crew she heard a sound like an explosion.
Another eyewitness said the car's engine had been thrown 50 to 60 yards from the car. There were no other vehicles involved in the accident.
The fire was so all-consuming that it took the Los Angeles County coroner's office two days to identify Hastings' body....
WHAT WAS HASTINGS WRITING ABOUT?
As our excerpt goes on, we find that Hastings had already been very effective at upsetting the existing power structure.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
Hastings practiced a brand of no-holds-barred journalism that tended to anger powerful people.
His 2010 profile of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, published in Rolling Stone, was so damaging that it ostensibly prompted President Barack Obama to fire the general (the president denied that the article had a role in his decision).
In the days before his death, Hastings was reportedly working on a story about a lawsuit filed by Jill Kelley, who was involved in the scandal that brought down Gen. David Petraeus, according to the LA Times.
KTLA reported that Hastings told colleagues at the news site BuzzFeed that he feared the FBI was investigating him.
On June 20, the FBI denied that any investigation was under way.
It is possible that Hastings was under a lot of pressure, got drunk, and went for a joyride. It is also possible that he was assassinated.
Was this fiery crash intended to stop Hastings from breaking his story, and intimidate other journalists from coming forward at the same time?
It is certainly true that the speed of new information leaks in the mainstream media decreased after Hastings' death, for almost two weeks, before it picked back up again.
However, even with strongly obvious, Mafia-style "hits" like this being openly conducted, there is no stopping the avalanche of disclosure.
After working hard to reveal the truth for so many years, I am relieved to see it all coming out now -- even though it is an incredible amount of work to try to keep up with all the new information now emerging.
WAS MICHAEL HASTINGS ASSASSINATED BY VEHICULAR REMOTE CONTROL?
These excerpts reveal that the fiery death of this journalist may have been intentional -- as he was working on a very major story right before it happened.
Wikileaks Says Michael Hastings Contacted Them Just Before Death
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100222652/wikileaks-says-michael-hastings-contacted-it-just-before-his-death-are-they-implying-he-was-murdered/
WikiLeaks just threw some gasoline onto the conspiracy fire. On Wednesday night, they Tweeted: “Michael Hastings contacted WikiLeaks lawyer Jennifer Robinson just a few hours before he died, saying that the FBI was investigating him.”….
And Hastings’ last article was about the evils of the NSA – which ended with the tantalising line, “Perhaps more information will soon be forthcoming.” Glenn Greenwald Tweeted a link to the piece after Hastings' death.
Hastings Said FBI Was Investigating Him
http://losangeles.cbslocal.com/2013/06/19/wikileaks-hastings-said-he-was-being-investigated-by-fbi/
CULVER CITY (CBSLA.com) — Questions persist following the death of Michael Hastings Tuesday, after reports that the award-winning journalist told WikiLeaks the government was watching him.
WikiLeaks tweeted a message to their millions of followers Wednesday stating that the 33-year-old author and war correspondent had contacted the organization’s lawyer to say he was being watched by the FBI….
Police have not yet confirmed that the person killed was Hastings because the body was reportedly burned beyond recognition.
One friend who declined to speak on camera said Hastings was very paranoid that he was being watched by the FBI, but that it is too soon to speculate on the conspiracy theories surrounding his death.
WHISTLEBLOWER REVEALS CARS CAN BE "HACKED"
Senior, high-ranking whistleblower Richard Clarke revealed to The Huffington Post that there are indeed ways to gain remote control of a vehicle, based on his insider knowledge.
If you read between the lines, Clarke appears to know a lot more about this system than what he has officially revealed in his statement.
Senior Insider Richard Clarke Reveals Cars Can Be Remote-Controlled
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/michael-hastings-car-hacked_n_3492339.html
The peculiar circumstances of journalist Michael Hastings' death in Los Angeles last week have unleashed a wave of conspiracy theories.
Now there's another theory to contribute to the paranoia: According to a prominent security analyst, technology exists that could've allowed someone to hack his car.
Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counter-terrorism Richard Clarke told The Huffington Post that what is known about the single-vehicle crash is "consistent with a car cyber attack."
Clarke said, "There is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers" -- including the United States -- know how to remotely seize control of a car.
"What has been revealed as a result of some research at universities is that it's relatively easy to hack your way into the control system of a car, and to do such things as cause acceleration when the driver doesn't want acceleration, to throw on the brakes when the driver doesn't want the brakes on, to launch an air bag," Clarke told The Huffington Post.
"You can do some really highly destructive things now, through hacking a car, and it's not that hard."
"So if there were a cyber attack on the car -- and I'm not saying there was," Clarke added, "I think whoever did it would probably get away with it."
