Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Yes—The Impostors are not impersonating what they are – crooks—But they “ARE” impersonating lawful public servants. That is FRAUD!!! That is a crime!
Posted on September 7, 2015 by arnierosnerOn Sep 6, 2015, at 7:25 AM, Steven Pattison (Kansas)
Dear Judge Anna von Reitz, of Alaska
Is Alaska one of the 50 several Union states with a Republican form of Government as guaranteed by the “Constitution for the United States of America”?
Or is Alaska an “instrumentality of the United States” as the definition of the term “United States” is defined within Section 3002. Definitions:
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States.
[url=http://scannedretina.com/2015/09/07/yes-the-impostors-are-not-impersonating-what-they-are-crooks-but-they-are-impersonating-lawful-public-servants-that-is-fraud-that-is-a-crime/00 AM, Anna Von Fritz %3cavannavon@gmail.com%3e wrote]On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Anna Von Fritz
First of all, they are not “impersonating” what they really are– “law enforcement officer” equals “corporate mall cop”. They are by definition operating as private corporate security forces in the international jurisdiction of the sea if they are “law enforcement officers”— because what is a “law” but a private code, regulation, or rule established by corporate policy? If you are not an employee of the corporation, and not chattel belonging to their corporation they have no business addressing you. Tell them so and prove it by consciously declaring it and repudiating the adhesion contracts that they use as a means to claim otherwise.
The “private corporate” you are referring to was done without “Delegated Authority” meaning that it was unconstitutional and “Null and Void” from the time it reportedly happened! Everything they do even if they are a de facto agent of the private corporation would be unconstitutional. Are any of these so called “private corporate” located in the sea? Where is the “international jurisdiction of the sea” and who created it?
[url=http://scannedretina.com/2015/09/07/yes-the-impostors-are-not-impersonating-what-they-are-crooks-but-they-are-impersonating-lawful-public-servants-that-is-fraud-that-is-a-crime/00 AM, Anna Von Fritz %3cavannavon@gmail.com%3e wrote]On Sep 3, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Anna Von Fritz
They are by definition operating as private corporate security forces in the international jurisdiction of the sea if they are “law enforcement officers”
Who’s definition? If it was done without “Delegated Authority” it would therefore be unconstitutional making it “Null and Void” and anyone using it would be acting under “Treason” levying war against anyone of “We the People”!
Do you agree?
[url=http://scannedretina.com/2015/09/07/yes-the-impostors-are-not-impersonating-what-they-are-crooks-but-they-are-impersonating-lawful-public-servants-that-is-fraud-that-is-a-crime/18 PM, Anna Von Reitz %3cavannavon@gmail.com%3e wrote]On Apr 21, 2015, at 5:18 PM, Anna Von Reitz
“Living Americans naturally inhabit their birthright estate and DO NOT “reside” in any “State of State” concocted by the Federal United States or any incorporated entity at all.”
“Each of us who were born on the land can reclaim their birth right estate and operate the land jurisdiction courts, legislatures, and executive branch of government on the land under the Last Man Standing Rule of our native Law.
Yes, as I said — if you can read and understand the Public Order, were born on the land of one of the Continental United States, and have reached the age of majority, you may act as a Judge of the (Blank) State Superior Court where you live and in its behalf.”
I am not sure how you defined all the words/terms within the last statement but why would anyone have to “reclaim their birth right”?
If anyone that is one of the People as in “We the People” they cannot have their Character changed unless they moved out of the United States of America, the one and only United States of America and they renounced their status as being a Citizen of one of the Republican Union states is the only way their Character could have been changed. Signing a loyalty oath without known what all the words meant would not stand in a lawful court.
JFK believe it to be a “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy”, a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
John F. Kennedy Speeches – The President and the Press: Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961 – jfklibrary.org:
“It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.”
“Thinking without knowing the truth is a big waste of your time.” Steven Wayne Pattison
“It’s a big waste of time to go through life being unclear about what must be true.” Steven Wayne Pattison
Steven Wayne Pattison reports on money – Could the National Debt and All Debts Be Eliminated?
Anna Von Fritz, your action and words may not be on point!
This email is in reply to the following email:
From: Anna Von Fritz [mailto:avannavon@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 8:43 PM
To: Steven Pattison (Kansas)
Subject: Re: Anna Von Fritz wrote
I have read many books and I direct you to read the following books and then reply again because your action and words may not be on point!
A GENERAL VIEW OF THE ORIGIN AND NATURE OF THE Constitution and Government of the United States, DEDUCED FROM THE POLITICAL HISTORY AND CONDITION OF THE COLONIES AND STATES, FROM 1774 UNTIL 1788 AND The Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States TOGETHER WITH Opinions in the Cases decided at January Term, 1837, ARISING ON THE Restraints on the Powers of the States, BY HENRY BALDWIN, One of the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States. PHILADELPHIA: PRINTED BY JOHN C. CLARK, 60 DOCK STREET 1837. INDEX TO THE PRINCIPAL MATTERS.
[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110115122221/http:/www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Pattison_Baldwin_1837.html#GENERAL VIEW]A GENERAL VIEW, &C.[/url]
[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110115122221/http:/www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Pattison_Baldwin_1837.html#THE CONSTITUTION IS A GRANT]THE CONSTITUTION IS A GRANT.[/url]
[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110115122221/http:/www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Pattison_Baldwin_1837.html#THE TERM STATE, AND UNITED STATES, AND THE PEOPLE]THE TERM “STATE,” AND “UNITED STATES,” AND “THE PEOPLE,”[/url] DEFINED AND EXPLAINED.
[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110115122221/http:/www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Pattison_Baldwin_1837.html#THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION..VII]THE ADOPTION OF THE CONSTITUTION.. VII.[/url]:
Here is simplicity of movement, and plainness in delineating, by whom, for whom the act was done, and what the act was when ordained. All history proves, and all opinions agree that it was in this way that the great work was accomplished in fact, and if so, there was no other way in which it could have been done; no reasoning can reverse the fact, or ingenuity make the act of nine distinct bodies of people the act of one, in whom all the power exerted, was previously vested.
[url=http://web.archive.org/web/20110115122221/http:/www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/Pattison_Baldwin_1837.html#THE PRACTICAL EFFECT AND OPERATION OF THE CONSTITUTION]THE PRACTICAL EFFECT AND OPERATION OF THE CONSTITUTION.[/url]
Download book here
The following book by Stephen and Tyler tells us how they without delegated authority changed our Law, Common Law to the Municipal Corporations using Roman Civil Codes which are really Codes and therefore unconstitutional because they do not provide for a Republican Form of Government which is guaranteed to all of us as “free sovereigns”. All the individuals reportedly inhabit within the Corporation are deemed to being citizens within the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia and that is how they force CODEs on all of us:
A treatise on the principles of pleading in civil actions: comprising a summary view of the whole proceedings in a suit at law, by Henry John Stephen and Samuel Tyler– Important read PREFACE (posted here) which is also in the download. Also read the first and last paragraph of the INTRODUCTION ([url=http://web.archive.org/web/20120425143144/http:/www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/TO_THE_ALUMNI_OF_THE_LAW_DEPARTMENT_OF_COLUMBIAN _COLLEGE.pdf]posted here[/url]). Download the THIRD AMERICAN – FROM THE SECOND LONDON EDITION: WITH A PREFACE, AN INTRODUCTION, A DISSERTATION ON PARTIES TO ACTIONS, AND NOTES. BY SAMUEL TYLER, LL. D., PROFESSOR IN THE LAW DEPARTMENT OF COLUMBIAN COLLEGE, WASHINGTON, D. C., AND AUTHOR OF THE MARYLAND SIMPLIFIED PLEADING, ETC., ETC.
Preface – BOUVIER’S LAW DICTIONARY 1914 PREFACE BY FRANCIS RAWLE volume I – http://ia700404.us.archive.org/21/items/bouvierslawdicti01bouv/bouvierslawdicti01bouv.pdf
What not to read when so many say we should – The Commentaries do not, therefore, in their original form, wholly represent the existing state of legislation or of legal doctrine, even in the country where they were written. When we consider, also, that in the United States the legal systems of the several States and of the Federal Government have since grown up, we cannot avoid the conclusion that the Lectures of Blackstone, in respect of what they contain as well as of what they do not contain, become still more inadequate as a book for elementary study or general reading, unless accompanied by judicious and carefully-prepared annotations.
You should read Skrswood’s Blackstone is the Text-Book in all the Law Schools of the United States.
Preface – BOUVIER’S LAW DICTIONARY 1914 PREFACE BY FRANCIS RAWLE volume I PDF page 11 within the following URL – http://ia700404.us.archive.org/21/items/bouvierslawdicti01bouv/bouvierslawdicti01bouv.pdf:
“Judge Baldwin (Modern Political Institutions 241) quotes Jeremiah Mason as saying that the development of an American Jurisprudence can only be looked for from the courts of the National Government. The Editor has been guided by that thought and sees in it a hope of increasing uniformity of law, towards which the profession, in its work on uniform legislation, is making real progress. He has therefore constantly cited the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and very frequently those of the lower Federal Courts. Of course, on many of the questions now being passed upon by the State Courts, the decisions of the Supreme Court are of binding authority.”
You should read Skrswood’s Blackstone (Note it would not load but I clicked on the download arrow and it opened in a PDF.) is the Text-Book in all the Law Schools of the United States. It took us a long time to find this piece of information.
The United States of America: A Study in International Organization edited by James Brown Scott [url=http://books.google.com/books?id=M8dAAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA444&dq=The+language+of+the+Constitution+and+of+many+acts+of+Congress+could+not+be+understood+without+reference+to+the+common+law.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mNQYVLDpA-ym8QG41oHADw&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=The language of the Constitution and of many acts of Congress could not be understood without reference to the common law.&f=false]PDF download[/url] Page 444:
“The question is, “By what law is the Court of Claims to be governed in this respect”? May it adopt its own rules of evidence? In our opinion, it must be governed by law; than the common law. That is the system from which our judicial ideas and legal definitions are derived. The language of the Constitution and of many acts of Congress could not be understood without reference to the common law.”
/S/ Steven Wayne Pattison
From: Anna Von Fritz [mailto:avannavon@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2015 8:43 PM
To: Steven Pattison (Kansas)
Subject: Re: Anna Von Fritz wrote
Read the book. Whether you like it or not I have told the truth under oath of the history of how we got into this mess.
It makes no sense to argue with the past and the conventions other generations established. They did what they did for better or worse.
They did not make it against the Law to name a corporation “United States of America”. They did not preclude the Delaware State from dealing subversively in chancery law and issuance of titles. They did not protest the existence of the Global Estate Trust. They instead contracted for inclusion and for services.
Those are the facts and the history of the matter and nothing we say or do in judgment of the results now will change them.
We have to deal with what is. So begin by looking it in the face.
America is not functioning as it should and it hasn’t for a long time.
Getting it back on course will take level heads and all hands on deck without a lot of whimpering or blame games. Let’s get on with pressing our claims and rebuilding the government we are owed.
Somehow the idea that that thing in Washington, DC is “our” government has to be erased and the understanding that it is NOT our government and never was our government needs to replace it.
Stubborn as this assumption is, it is clearly wrong.
The Federal United States is and always was a separate nation with respect to us.
The quicker you get that piece of information straight, the better.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 5, 2015, at 1:13 PM, Steven Pattison (Kansas)
Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com
